Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looking at a map of MLB teams...it's only a matter of time...


panthersphan

Recommended Posts

Dude..they play in Fort Mill!!

That's like 30 minutes from me old house in Southeast Charlotte...

If the Knights were Uptown attendance (and season ticket sales) would by much much higher...

I'm just saying...eventually...it can happen...

The Twins, Marlins, and Expos all talked about Charlotte for relocation...so we're on the "radar"...who else is...Portland, OR i'd say...maybe even San Antonio...Memphis/Nashville? Indianapolis? Jacksonville? Louisville? Las Vegas? No. Norfolk? No. Vegas would get NBA before anything...and I don't see that happening soon...

I'd say Portland is the next...just because they only have one team (NBA) and have about 2 million people in the metro area...

Move...

KC Royals ----> Charlotte Royals (perfect for the "Queen City" and get to play in the Central instead of the very competitive East and I don't see the Rays moving now that their good...Marlins maybe but I don't see them giving us a team in the same division as the Braves)

Oakland A's ---->Portland A's (Talked about moving if they don't get a new field and wouldn't have to change divisions...would set up a nice Portland/Seattle rivalry)

PLEASE, NO MORE EXPANSION!!!

The A's are most likely moving to San Jose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I'd love it but man... so many home games per year. Whats TWC Arena hold? Then what would a MLB park hold? A lot more. And twice the games...

I'd love to see it but I think we're 10-15 years away from getting it. Although can you imagine how awesome it would be if we had the Twins with Mauer playing in Charlotte right now lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...