Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We could easily go 10-6


Verge

Recommended Posts

I said before, replace Naka... run the ball in a more conventional manner and yes I do seeing us going 10-6, 9-7 barring any injuries

I feel we'll beat the Seahawks. I feel we're have more than enough time to plan for the Cowboys which may be our downfall cause we'll be coming off the break but we'll be fresh

The coach man, Rivera just looks lost out there man. We're not going anywhere if he has no idea what's going on around him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

next sunday is going to be a 3 hour long marshawn lynch highlight reel.

Actually I domt think so. We are only bad against the run when we play a team that can both pass well and run well. Lookat the Vikes last year, we did well keeping AP in check because we can focus on stopping the run game, Seattle's passing game is non existent so we can stack the line and keep Lynch in check

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok here is some math for you. If we beat the Seahawks we will be 2-3. Last year we didnt win our 2nd game until week 11.. Week 11! We stood at 2-8 and we still won 6 games. Now, i know it never is an exact science but if we win 2 games out of 5 versus 2 out of 10, we could quite pissible win 12 games.

Eagles started 1-4 last year and came a win away from a Wild card oh and Falcons started 2-3 last year and also made the playoffs. Next week is do ir die.

Not only is it pissible we can win 12 games it is quite pissible we will win 13 games. I hope it is pissible that we make a run in the playoffs and pissablly make the SuperBowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This play was never designed to go to either DJ or Odunze. The primary read is Burden who is stymied early, with the outlet being Kmet if Caleb doesn't like the option for Burden. Given the situation it's pretty obvious the simple play is to take the free yards with Kmet, or if you want to be aggressive just wait a beat longer for Burden to uncover on his double move. If Moore was ever going to be a viable target in this play then Caleb should have started out reading Odunze to hold the safety in the middle and then coming to Moore, but because he started the snap staring down the right and then came back to the middle late it made it where the safety's leverage remained to the outside of Moore, so he would never have imagined that pass actually being thrown to him in that situation. Realistically DJ's best option in that context is to just occupy the safety to leave a hole open for Caleb to get it to Burden, which is probably why he throttles down vs carrying the safety across.
    • Even with Sonny Styles still on the board I thought it's a no brainer to address the Oline after Icky's injury.  And how can you pass up Fano at 19 given our situation. Then the rest of the draft just kind of made sense with maybe the exception of Klubnik.  But if Canales can fix him and Young goes down. . .I think it's a solid pick. What do you think of this draft?
    • When we didn't trade him to the Rams or the Bears (I believe the Bears said they would take one of Brown/ Burns/DJ Moore) we should have just signed him and kept him.  We should have traded him to the Rams obviously and we should have kept DJ and traded Burns.  We made all three wrong choices with Burns lol.
×
×
  • Create New...