Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching/QB Observations


Davis83

Recommended Posts

As I watched games Sunday, I kept being drawn to watching the HC's. Here is what I saw:

(won't even pretend to know names)

Raiders - Young coach : Attentive to all aspects of the game, carrying a clip board - making notes. Speaking constantly on his headset. Always engaging players - waiving them back from the sideline, motioning for them to hurry up. I saw a QB on the sideline one on one with a receiver going over a route and maybe what the QB was looking for in that route - not just when something good happens (high 5, laughing, etc..) this was right after an INT.

Falcons - same

NYG - veteran coach: ditto on the sideline demeanor. Ditto on the QB / WR interaction

Packers: Saw the HC down on 1 knee in a huddle with his entire offensive line! - going over some photo's and coming up with a solution?

Ravens/49ers - although a bit explosive, both coaches very involved with all aspects of the game.

Seeing a pattern? All I see when I vision the Panthers is a HC fixing someones helmet during a defensive timeout that "we" called. Shouldn't our Defensive minded HC be involved with the discussion of the defense in a critical situation?

I just don't get it.

Good observation Rivera and his coordinators need to get more involved in the game.This is not a chess match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He needs to be more directive and involved

I think he just means that Rivera wasn't getting turned down for jobs because he was a Rooney rule interview and he was being discriminated against.

I'll admit that at this point I kinda wonder if 9 other teams didn't see something in him that we failed to see and that's why he never got a break. I'm sure he's a great guy and I'm know he's a good DC but with fundamental things on this team declining rapidly from last season I have to wonder if he's just not cut out for this job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he just means that Rivera wasn't getting turned down for jobs because he was a Rooney rule interview and he was being discriminated against.

I'll admit that at this point I kinda wonder if 9 other teams didn't see something in him that we failed to see and that's why he never got a break. I'm sure he's a great guy and I'm know he's a good DC but with fundamental things on this team declining rapidly from last season I have to wonder if he's just not cut out for this job.

If I could see a progression in the team and adjustments in the scheme but the excuse the team did not execute when they run this read option over and over shows me he has no clue.He needs a scheme that we can execute

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I could see a progression in the team and adjustments in the scheme but the excuse the team did not execute when they run this read option over and over shows me he has no clue.He needs a scheme that we can execute

He does. There are also things on the other side of the ball that lead me to believe he's not getting the job done. Tackling? The entire team didn't forget how to tackle in the offseason - that has to be a coaching / management problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"GUYS IF WE WERE WINNING NONE OF THIS WOULD MATTER, THEREFORE NONE OF THIS MATTERS!!!!!"

^How do those people still exist? It doesn't matter what was close to happening, what might have happened, what could have happened. All that matters is what has happened consistently which is losing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bellicheck isn't the most animated guy. I want a guy who will have our players prepared for all situations. I want a team that isn't afraid to let go of guys who serve no purpose on our roster. I just want to win. The way acts on the sideline is being overblown. My concern with Ron is the team doesn't seem prepared, time management sucks and has no one on the staff has head coaching exp. to help him.

He is widely considered the best coach in the league too. Rah-Rah fanatics want rah-rah coaches. Raheem Morris, Jack Del Rio, Steve Spagnulo, and Jim Haslem screamed or yelled till slobber ran down their mouth. They couldn't produce consistent winners though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Tom Cat

Fat Pat fails again

not a good pic to bolster your claim that camster is involved - looks to me like he has a towel over his head and is ignoring his coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...