Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers schedule gets easier


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Panther opponents during the first 7 games are 31-20, a winning percentage of nearly 61%.

The remaining opponents'winning percentage is 45%--39% if you do not include the Falcons.

It looks as though the Panthers are about to go on their trademark, post-elimination, season-concluding, job-saving, winning streak.

It makes me sick to think that at least 3 of the losses were due to coaching (lack of adjustments, prep) and how many leads we blew in the 4th quarter.

if we win 6 of the last 9 (assume the players find a way to minimize the impact of their coaching), how will that impact the offseason?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strength of schedules have never meant anything to me. You still have to go out and execute every week.

No offense, but this is one of the weakest stats in all of sports

this.

the only reason carolina's first 7 games look tough from a strength of schedule standpoint is because they lost to those teams.

if carolina continues to lose, they easy remaining schedule will look tough when you look back at it at the end of the season.

win and it will look easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this.

the only reason carolina's first 7 games look tough from a strength of schedule standpoint is because they lost to those teams.

if carolina continues to lose, they easy remaining schedule will look tough when you look back at it at the end of the season.

win and it will look easier.

Not only that, but the teams we have played will also lose more... So while right now it looks like we've played all the juggernauts... In reality it will all even out. This is the NFL not the NCAA... Any given Sunday any team is one injury away from ruining a game if not a season.

Need proof? Imagine this... In two plays we can lose Cam, and Derek Anderson for the rest of the season... That leaves us with Pickles...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see your points because the ball bounces funny ways, there are injuries and emotions involved, etc, but I do not think this season's wins and losses is a trivial statistic that has no bearing on the liklihood of future wins and losses in the current season. Usually strength of schedule" refers to predicitons based on last year's records. Probability is a factor used in the compilation of statistics, where past peformance is the best indicator of future performance given regulated and consistent conditions. Statistically, if I play 10 games against teams that have won 40% of their games I will win more than if I play 10 games against teams that have won 60% of their games, regardless of what my record is.

However, this post was to suggest that a team, the Panthers, reverses the trend of losing because they will be facing other teams that have also found winning to be difficult. The fact that people think that will not happen based on the Panthers' record and recent performance are actually supporting the supposition that they are questioning.

Last year's record is irrelevent. Injuries have healed, personnel moves have been made, there is a new climate in the locker room. This year's record reflects current problems or the lack of them--Not insignificant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get it. Why didn't you include the Falcons? Has the game been cancelled?

I did (45%) , but I wanted to show that half of the schedule (8 games) has a win percentage of 39%. The falcons skews the stats a bit, adding 6% because they are undefeated.

We have 7 games left against teams with losing records.

I am willing to bet anyone on here that our record is much better than 1-6 in those games. Statistically, we should win 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...