Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting theory from Cold Hard Football Facts


Fireball77

Recommended Posts

They admit that they don't have as much data as is needed to postulate this theory is valid over time, but it is compelling nonetheless.

Sad that Carolina had a worse pass defense than the Saints. :(

I think that I would like to see them add rushing defense to this metric because SOMETIMES the pass D looks better than it is because teams only need to run on the other team to control the game, and vice versa. Colts probably have a bit of that in their DPR. Then there is Minny. They have had a below average pass D for years, and their run D is actually very good so that's legit. TB did actually have a good pass D but their run D suffered after the Cats beat them down. Would like to see how that changed the passer rating against them if any.

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_2737_Secrets_of_the_universe!.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh snap, didn't even catch that. lol

We always like people who agree with us I guess. :P

Well it is the truth. You can have a huge number of passing yards because you're coming from behind and are forced to pass, and the other team is willing to give up some passing yards but won't give up the long play for a TD. Stats are one of those things most people just don't know how to interpret because people (ESPN) constantly hawk on the "big numbers" because it's more attractive than a QB having high YPA or TD/INT, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

more accurate gauge would be just using the 16 game season.

anyway, i don't care if the saints were. the 2nd half of the season the defense fell apart. there were some huge problems going on not just with the pass D but the run D as well. we got rid of a huge problem that we had when we lost trgo. i have no doubt that our pass D will be dramatically improved because of meeks and the rest of the new coaching staff. also our own passer rating should be improved because of rip's work on jake.

with or without the post season's inclusion, next year's differential will be a lot different and we should find ourselves in the top 5 of that list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still say that what hurt our defense more than anything was injuries. Kemo was playing on a bad ankle, Lewis was playing with a bad shoulder, and Beason has since admitted that he was basically playing with one arm in the last 5-6 games. That, my friends, is the heart of the defense. It's just like the old saying...you have to be strong up the middle, and the Panthers weren't at the end of the season.

That's not to say that there weren't problems in the secondary or that Trgo's defense didn't get a little stale, but if you're weak up the middle, you've got real problems, regardless of what scheme you run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right...I think they've done really well. No one's going to bat 1000% but they've addressed areas of need and there's no comparison to the overall talent of the team now than when DC and then Morgan got the reigns. This whole season is about seeing how much of a step up can Bryce and this team make. If Bryce can't and last year is as good as it gets for him then at least we have a talented roster for the next guy. I think we're going to be good this season 
    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
×
×
  • Create New...