Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Challenge in the NFC Championship Game


KendrickPanther

Recommended Posts

In the NFC Championship Game an ATL player caught a pass with two hands and went to the ground. When the ball hit the ground it moved in his hands but his hands remained on the ball. It was ruled a catch on the field and the play stood upon review.

I want to cover this from two angles.

First, I thought the refs blew the call even with replay. If that is the correct rule then i disagree with the rule. The ground clearly moved the ball. He clearly did not have a firm grip on the football. The offense has the advantage in virtually every situation and now we are stretching the boundaries of what qualifies as a catch.

Second, I was impressed that Harbaugh and his staff were on the ball ready to pull the trigger on a red flag. Matt Ryan was hurrying his team up to the line to get a play off and they made a quick decision to risk a timeout late in a close game for an important 3rd down reception.

I asked myself if Ron Rivera and his staff would have been prepared to make the challenge in a hectic situation while also setting their defense in case the opponent got the play off? I believe it was the Seahawks game where J Stew caught a ball for a first down then fumbled it backwards and recovered it out of bounds short of the line to gain. By rule if the ball is recovered out of bounds it is returned to the spot of the fumble which would have been a first down but the ball was spotted for 4th down and we punted. I was screaming at my TV challenge the call and we just punted it away....These are the little things that Rivera fails miserably at. He's ok at running a defense and letting the offense do it's thing but these game management decisions have been appalling. Hopefully he can correct those because he would honestly be a decent Head Coach without those errors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The refs have been blowing calls all year. With that said, it was initially ruled a catch and needed clear cut evidence to overturn it. It bobbled but that left hand had a grip on it.

Harbaugh's reaction to it was hilarious, though.

Hooray for emotion!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the head replay guy said it was right. I agree with him more than you, a fan.

He's not the head replay guy. He works for fox. He's a retired official. Somehow I doubt you agree with anyone. If that is the correct ruling then they need to change the ruling because that didn't smell right. We football fans, coaches, and players that have known the game have seen it evolve from Bert Emanual being ruled incomplete merely for touching the ground to that guy completing a catch while the the ground moves the ball from his hands to his waist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...