Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person: "Ron Edwards Will Be Cut"


rscott94

Recommended Posts

You are correct on only 1 of of the 3 assertions that you made:

1. Edwards has been injured a lot....check

2. Edwards in not very good....wrong. Edwards played very well when he was in there

3. Dwan kept the intertion of the line together.....wrong. Dwan was good against the pass....but was a BIG liability against the run

I guess we can agree to disagree. I trout Dwan was good against the run and Ron seemed to be no better than Kearse and barely better than Fua. People here slam Fua, but he was actually pretty decent later in the year. Average DTs like Ron are a dime a dozen and I'm not losing sleep over an old, injury prone, average DT getting cut. That's my point. Dwan is far more important to our D than Ron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess we can agree to disagree. I trout Dwan was good against the run and Ron seemed to be no better than Kearse and barely better than Fua. People here slam Fua, but he was actually pretty decent later in the year. Average DTs like Ron are a dime a dozen and I'm not losing sleep over an old, injury prone, average DT getting cut. That's my point. Dwan is far more important to our D than Ron.

Ron is that big fat guy type of space eater. He is good at what he does. And, Kease is not quite as good as Ron was.

But, he is not a Major piece for this defense and I won't lose too much sleep if he is cut.

I do agree with you that Dwan should be kept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron is that big fat guy type of space eater. He is good at what he does. And, Kease is not quite as good as Ron was.

But, he is not a Major piece for this defense and I won't lose too much sleep if he is cut.

I do agree with you that Dwan should be kept.

I don't disagree, but big fat space eaters that don't tackle are a dime a dozen. I thought Ron was a weakness on our D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So... what metrics for production do you believe display these issues/limitations best? Are we only using total passing yards, height, and weight thresholds? If so, then what are those thresholds?
    • I mean as far as his size goes it's all over his tape bouncing up and down on his toes in and around the pocket trying to see the field and defenses know this as well as we do but if folks here want to live in never never land and pretend it's not a thing that's their prerogative. Even our head coach has made it a key focal point to get his footwork under control. But it's still something Bryce is going to be tested on early and often no matter how many keystrokes anyone here commits to the narrative it isn't an issue.
    • It speaks volumes that when asked to define a clear performance threshold the responses instead fixate on Bryce's size. It reinforces what’s been clear for a while now... that for some, it has never been nor will it ever be about production. Any struggles will always be chalked up to his frame, and any strong play will be downplayed or disqualified via highly mobile goalposts.
×
×
  • Create New...