Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patterson - FYI

TMS3426

By TMS3426,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Happy Panther Grand Master

Happy Panther

Posted
Posted

If NFL teams are the ones saying that the interviews didn't go well, they can't just be thrown out because 'his football IQ is high.' They're not asking the kid to memorize the periodic table here, they're asking questions that they think matter.

This.

These are job interviews and they are seeing something they don't like.

Guy might be dumb as a bag of hammers but he is failing interviews. Might be a

1) Will not be a good locker room presence

2) Has no desire to develop

3) Too immature

4) Overall gut feel.

Granted I interview people for finance jobs not NFL jobs so maybe I am full of poop

Link to comment
Share on other sites
koolkatluke Newbie

koolkatluke

Posted
Posted

this is actually someone else's argument, ive just heard you bash it before. so it doesnt hurt anything if it isnt mine. hear you go again never fully reading post and just responding from you a-hole

When are you going to grow up dude? Not 1 point in this conversation have I called you a name. Why do you feel the need to resorts to this childish behavior. It really isn't that serious. If you can't dispute what I'm saying then just say "well let's agree to disagree". Its that simple not to be a child during a debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
IamSoClutch Newbie

IamSoClutch

Posted
Posted

When are you going to grow up dude? Not 1 point in this conversation have I called you a name. Why do you feel the need to resorts to this childish behavior. It really isn't that serious. If you can't dispute what I'm saying then just say "well let's agree to disagree". Its that simple not to be a child during a debate.

stop changing the subject. FACT: you misread my post and assumed it was my argument(debate that). you act like you have a flawless reputation for no name calling. if a apple is red the apple is red. if bs is coming out you a-hole its coming out your a hole. i call it like i see it

Link to comment
Share on other sites
koolkatluke Newbie

koolkatluke

Posted
Posted

stop changing the subject. FACT: you misread my post and assumed it was my argument(debate that). you act like you have a flawless reputation for no name calling. if a apple is red the apple is red. if bs is coming out you a-hole its coming out your a hole. i call it like i see it

How did i misread your post? You replied to my post when i question the reasoning of using Cam as example to take Patterson. Only using the similarity of opinions in a scouts break down of both players. You felt like you can't compare what a QB did in college to a WR. I agree so why even use Cam as a example when you have better example with actual WR who have more similarities with Patterson. Was my argument. Then you went all pre school on me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaCityKats Rookie

DaCityKats

Posted
Posted

guess i will leave this here

Old Tennessee coach Derek Dooley told NFL.com's Gil Brandt that WR Cordarrelle Patterson "can be a head coach's delight."

Dooley's background is as a receivers coach and he now oversees the Cowboys' wideouts. His comment suggests Patterson isn't the headcase detractors have suggested he'll be at the next level. Patterson needs to learn to run routes with more explosion and confidence, but he may be the most talented offensive skill player in the draft. Brandt ranks Patterson as his No. 8 overall prospect.

http://www.rotoworld.com/playernews/nfl/football

Link to comment
Share on other sites
IamSoClutch Newbie

IamSoClutch

Posted
Posted

How did i misread your post? You replied to my post when i question the reasoning of using Cam as example to take Patterson. Only using the similarity of opinions in a scouts break down of both players. You felt like you can't compare what a QB did in college to a WR. I agree so why even use Cam as a example when you have better example with actual WR who have more similarities with Patterson. Was my argument. Then you went all pre school on me.

They do have SOME similarities but not ALL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Carolina Still Not Respected

      By Navy_football · Posted

      I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • electro's horse
      The "now it's been three years" Grade for the 2023 Draft

      By electro's horse · Posted

      probably the 2nd worst draft in team history
    • tukafan21
      Strength of Schedule

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...