Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Larry Brown vs. Phil Jackson

King Taharqa

By King Taharqa,
in Charlotte Hornets

Who is the better coach?  

15 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is the better coach?

    • Phil Jackson
      10
    • Larry Brown
      5

Recommended Posts

King Taharqa Newbie

King Taharqa

Posted
Posted

Now that Phil has his 10th NBA championship, some are calling him the best coach in the league and the greatest NBA coach of all time. Ive seen others praise Coach Brown who's won on all levels as the best NBA coach of all time. Who would you rather have as your guy?

17_phil36_large.jpg

1998-0614-2.jpg

phil_jackson.jpg

.vs

2nluusj.jpg

nba_a_brown_jordan2_580.jpg

061220_brown_vmed_5p.widec.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kevin Greene Newbie

Kevin Greene

Posted
Posted

Don't know how you could really make a case for Brown. Just the fact alone that you can't trust him to finish what he starts. Already blown through 9 organizations in his career.

Stats?

Brown .552 winning percentage regular season all time. .529 in the playoffs.

Jackson .705 winning percentage regular season. .697 in the playoffs.

1 NBA title vs 10.

Brown's a helluva coach, just flakey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
King Taharqa Newbie

King Taharqa

Posted
  • Author
Posted

You guys make good points. Phil Jackson has also had the fortune of coaching 2 franchises, both of which were playoff teams prior to his arrival and are loaded with a plethora of HOFers. Coach Brown has coached 9 franchises (an NBA record), and has transformed the culture in all of them excluding his NY stint. Here's a coach who will truly build a team from the ground up and take them into the dance. This guy took the Clippers to the playoffs!!! THE CLIPPERS!!! Can we get some head to head stats?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...