Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?


Recommended Posts

Michael Silver says there was a trade in place with a team in the teens that was willing to come up and trade with Baltimore but they backed out at the end and countered with a less favorable package 

Jon & Ollie think it might have been the #Panthers to secure their tackle 
 

https://x.com/threesandtds24/status/2048919722595602788?s=46&t=xeIgh_-Vr2aKxBkBJdfnKA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If true, this is great news. We must have gotten enough information to know our guy would still be there at 19. Once Proctor went 12 and Ty Simpson went 13, we knew one of Monroe Freeling and Blake Miller would be there. I really think they liked Miller and would have taken him at 19 if the Lions had gone Freeling

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, XClown1986 said:

If true, this is great news. We must have gotten enough information to know our guy would still be there at 19. Once Proctor went 12 and Ty Simpson went 13, we knew one of Monroe Freeling and Blake Miller would be there. I really think they liked Miller and would have taken him at 19 if the Lions had gone Freeling

100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, XClown1986 said:

If true, this is great news. We must have gotten enough information to know our guy would still be there at 19. Once Proctor went 12 and Ty Simpson went 13, we knew one of Monroe Freeling and Blake Miller would be there. I really think they liked Miller and would have taken him at 19 if the Lions had gone Freeling

Lions were never going Freeling over Miller for the same reason we wouldn't have taken Miller had Freeling not been on the board.

Miller is a career RT

Lions have a hole at RT, we have a hole at LT.

If we took Miller, it would have been for him to backup Moton until he retires and/or we release him, so the best case scenario is it would have been a wasted 1st round pick for at least 1, if not 2 years.  At least Freeling has a shot at playing this year without injury ahead of him, he absolutely can win the LT job if he earns it, but Miller would have never supplanted Moton this year unless he got hurt.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Lions were never going Freeling over Miller for the same reason we wouldn't have taken Miller had Freeling not been on the board.

Miller is a career RT

Lions have a hole at RT, we have a hole at LT.

If we took Miller, it would have been for him to backup Moton until he retires and/or we release him, so the best case scenario is it would have been a wasted 1st round pick for at least 1, if not 2 years.  At least Freeling has a shot at playing this year without injury ahead of him, he absolutely can win the LT job if he earns it, but Miller would have never supplanted Moton this year unless he got hurt.

Lions only have a hole at RT because they're moving thier all pro RT to LT 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tukafan21 said:

Lions were never going Freeling over Miller for the same reason we wouldn't have taken Miller had Freeling not been on the board.

Miller is a career RT

Lions have a hole at RT, we have a hole at LT.

If we took Miller, it would have been for him to backup Moton until he retires and/or we release him, so the best case scenario is it would have been a wasted 1st round pick for at least 1, if not 2 years.  At least Freeling has a shot at playing this year without injury ahead of him, he absolutely can win the LT job if he earns it, but Miller would have never supplanted Moton this year unless he got hurt.

Yep,and Blake Miller have had more experiences than Freeling,Lions did not sigh a vet T like Walker,so they had to pick Miller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14. 
Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough. 
 

It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even. 
 

Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...