Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Russell Wilson


Zod

Recommended Posts

He is a game manager, and a good one. I never said being a game manager was a bad thing. Plenty of them have superbowl rings.

 

Wilson flat made that win happen. Not the first time.

 

You are seriously biased or too egotistical to admit when wrong. Either way, getting comical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh Thomas

 

But that is exactly my point. Scrub corners. RW can only kill you when he is out of the pocket and buys time with his feet. If a QB can buy time, he can find an open WR.

 

Anyways, I hate to say it but he beat us fair and square today. I wish Cam can "carry" the game on his back like RW did today. Still fug RW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To early to say who will be the best out of these good young quarterbacks. We definitely got the best one from 2011 but it is debatable when you put Cam up against the quarterbacks from 2012.

That being said I will still take Cam. I think he is right in the mix with those guys but he has a higher ceiling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...