Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Russell Wilson


Zod

Recommended Posts

He is a game manager, and a good one. I never said being a game manager was a bad thing. Plenty of them have superbowl rings.

 

Wilson flat made that win happen. Not the first time.

 

You are seriously biased or too egotistical to admit when wrong. Either way, getting comical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh Thomas

 

But that is exactly my point. Scrub corners. RW can only kill you when he is out of the pocket and buys time with his feet. If a QB can buy time, he can find an open WR.

 

Anyways, I hate to say it but he beat us fair and square today. I wish Cam can "carry" the game on his back like RW did today. Still fug RW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To early to say who will be the best out of these good young quarterbacks. We definitely got the best one from 2011 but it is debatable when you put Cam up against the quarterbacks from 2012.

That being said I will still take Cam. I think he is right in the mix with those guys but he has a higher ceiling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...