Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What 49ers Fans are Saying


Zod

Recommended Posts

So now your secondary piece of supporting evidence is another isolated comment from a viewpoint from which you claim to disagree with as a whole but because that one line that May or may not have been said was in there supports your "controversial" comment here on the Huddle you feel as if that line and that line alone is credible and worthy to be taken as law.

Which of course led to you tossing a number of other "sources" just assuming they'd feel the same way.

Provide your evidence and sources. And get back to me. I'm done with you and your attempt to counter my argument by pointing out the flaws. Yet, the flaw in your argument is YOU HAVE NOTHING TO BACKUP WHAT YOU ARE SAYING. Nut up or shut up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol I don't mean to interrupt your "eppileptic brekdown" by any stretch, but I don't need to demean you when you're doing an excellent job of it yourself.

you have zero substantial evidence to suggest Kaepernick's arm is stronger than Newton's. you sat around your house one day watching footbal, fanboyed over it, and took some extreme opinion without any factual backing and are now resorting to false objectivity and a persecution complex to try and cover your tail.

there is no evidence to support your claim. none. isolating one stupid play that you spontaneously elected to fawn over isnt evidence lol.

 

Here's some evidence to support the claim.  Both Kap and Cam were at the same combine, and Kap tested out better in the arm strength department.   Kap threw the ball at 59 mph, and Cam's best throw was 56 mph, 3rd in the draft. He also throws a 95mph baseball.   And though its not actual physical evidence, most talking heads think Kaepernick or Flacco has the strongest arm.

 

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/28/source-radar-gun-says-kaepernick-had-combines-strongest-arm/

 

 

Anyway, if you compare that stupid play as you call it to the best throw of Cam's you can find, you might have a point.  See ify ou can find a throw that illustrates Cam's "stronger" arm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's some evidence to support you claim. Both Kap and Cam were at the same combine, and Kap tested out better in the arm strength department. Kap threw the ball at 59 mph, and Cam's best throw was 56 mph, 3rd in the draft. He also throws a 95mph baseball. And though its not actual physical evidence, most talking heads think Kaepernick or Flacco has the strongest arm.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/28/source-radar-gun-says-kaepernick-had-combines-strongest-arm/

Anyway, if you compare that stupid play as you call it to the best throw of Cam's you can find, you might have a point. See ify ou can find a throw that illustrates Cam's "stronger" arm.

I'll take this. I wouldn't accept it as the be all end all but I take it as evidence. (I'd also toss out as a counter Cam was only 21 or 22 at the combine and had more room for development, but whatev, it's good evidence, which wasn't so much to ask for)

As for looking up "plays" I most certainly could. I'm not going to because you have access to the web and I don't care to, but I assure you it's something I could do. His massive heave on the move against GB in his 2nd game comes to mind as does his rifle to Greg Olsen in our last game in which Olsen said he'd never caught a harder thrown ball.

Again though, isolating plays frankly doesn't mean that much to me, ad as a disclaimer, I should mention the velocity of a ball isn't the sole indicator of arm strength as legwork plays a significant role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provide your evidence and sources. And get back to me. I'm done with you and your attempt to counter my argument by pointing out the flaws. Yet, the flaw in your argument is YOU HAVE NOTHING TO BACKUP WHAT YOU ARE SAYING. Nut up or shut up.

Lol I'm not "claiming" anything. I have outright said there's no way to know. You made a controversial claim which you backed up with "look at this play!" And then, after much prompting, finally provided a secondary piece of evidence which was essentially "everything this guy said is dumb, except for this one thing right here which supports the argument I've been making, conveniently."

I don't recommend pursuing a career in the legal field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More yards higher percentage yada yada... And scoring less points...

You are hilarious most of the game? He played almost a full half and had one catch for two yards and even with him your limp dick offense couldn't score a TD on the panthers defense (at home none the less).

The bottom line is you can have all the weapons you want the reason we stopped you wasn't the lack of them it was because we put the heat on Kaepernick and held your ground game in check.

You barely had 150 yards of TOTAL offense and no TDs at home.

 

It doesnt matter to the 49ers where they play.  They dont play any better at home than they do on the road, so a bad performance at home isnt any difference than a bad performance on the road.  Every team has them, including carolina.

 

So if he didnt play a full half, and he sat for more than a full hallf, sounds like 'most' to me.  Anyway, he was only targeted twice that game, so he didnt seem to be much of the game plan. Since that game he's averaged no less than 5-6 targets a touchdown each game.   He was not a factor in that game, but now with healthy Davis and healthy Crabtree, the offense next sunday wont even be the same as what carolina faced in week 10. 

 

Yes, holding a ground game in check and hassling  qb is the key to winning just about any game you can play in the NFL.   It also goes both ways, something the 49er D was successful enough at to keep them to only 2 scoring drives.   Points and yards will come at a premium sunday.  Thats why I think having Davis & crabtree healthy giving them a previously unknown offensive boost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take this. I wouldn't accept it as the be all end all but I take it as evidence. (I'd also toss out as a counter Cam was only 21 or 22 at the combine and had more room for development, but whatev, it's good evidence, which wasn't so much to ask for)

As for looking up "plays" I most certainly could. I'm not going to because you have access to the web and I don't care to, but I assure you it's something I could do. His massive heave on the move against GB in his 2nd game comes to mind as does his rifle to Greg Olsen in our last game in which Olsen said he'd never caught a harder thrown ball.

Again though, isolating plays frankly doesn't mean that much to me, ad as a disclaimer, I should mention the velocity of a ball isn't the sole indicator of arm strength as legwork plays a significant role.

Cool, you could do it, thats good. Kap could through for 500 yards sunday too.

 

Randy Moss is a hall of famer, knows a thing or two about qbs, and he thinks Kap's arm is the strongest; says in all his years of football, it was a Kap fastball that dislocated his finger.  But that's just conjecture, just like Olsen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't go to the WebZone to get a feel for 49ers fans, go to the actual 49ers messageboard.

 

 

Webzone is a free for all for homerism. We at the main messageboard have some sense.

 

 

 

Now, Eff all of you Panthers fans, we'z abouts to wax dat azzzzzz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

 

(Blue means sarcsm on our boards)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't go to the WebZone to get a feel for 49ers fans, go to the actual 49ers messageboard.

 

 

Webzone is a free for all for homerism. We at the main messageboard have some sense.

 

 

 

Now, Eff all of you Panthers fans, we'z abouts to wax dat azzzzzz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

 

(Blue means sarcsm on our boards)

As I tried to tell them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently, no one is aware that the Panthers are 10 - 7 against the 49ers lifetime, that the 49ers are tied with us in Superbowl losses since we came into the league, that it's been 13 years since they've beaten  us, and during those 13 years, we've  beaten them four times.

 

And we're  the underdog?

'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't go to the WebZone to get a feel for 49ers fans, go to the actual 49ers messageboard.

 

 

Webzone is a free for all for homerism. We at the main messageboard have some sense.

 

 

 

Now, Eff all of you Panthers fans, we'z abouts to wax dat azzzzzz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

 

(Blue means sarcsm on our boards)

 

link?

 

every 49er board I have been to wants me to sign up to read it.

 

 

not that I would really read it anyways....  I prefer green

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...