Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2014 Huddle mock offseason rules/ offense and specialist FA pool

DaCityKats

By DaCityKats,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Yea, bc DCK think that you're smarter than that and he didnt need to tell you poo you should already know.

 

Stay realistic dude. Cutting both Dwill and Stew is not going to happen. You have a better chance of cutting Charles Johnson.

 

See post above. Read again. Emphasis on the very last line of text.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kevin Greene Newbie

Kevin Greene

Posted
Posted

one could honestly make the argument for both sides of the Long and Bradford case.

 

 

Just depends how you want to do it DCK.

Obviously in the real NFL releasing Bradford or probably even Jonathon Stewart wouldn't happen because the real world Cap consequences would be catastrophic.

It can be done inside this arena of course, the consequences here being draft picks will be completely different than they will be come NFL Draft Day.

Teams not even remotely in the hunt for a QB will be selecting at that position when in reality they won't be.

So a draft with some semblance to reality or what is transpiring here.

 

I know I make the argument every year that a straight draft would be more realistic but perhaps this is more fun(?).

I've said my piece.

 

Carry on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Riverboat Ron Mentor

Riverboat Ron

Posted
Posted

one could honestly make the argument for both sides of the Long and Bradford case.

 

Wouldn't surprise me at all if the Rams fall in love with a QB and if he's available at #2 they take him and cut Bradford, would save $10 million in cap space and free them from the fail that is Sam Bradford. I think Long will stay even with the injury, though if the Rams don't like a QB and don't want a DE or WR, they could draft an OT and cut long or play Matthews at RT with Long at LT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

Wouldn't surprise me at all if the Rams fall in love with a QB and if he's available at #2 they take him and cut Bradford, would save $10 million in cap space and free them from the fail that is Sam Bradford. I think Long will stay even with the injury, though if the Rams don't like a QB and don't want a DE or WR, they could draft an OT and cut long or play Matthews at RT with Long at LT.

 

Exactly.

 

This is how I see it as the GM of the Rams. There's some productive free agent QBs that I can look. Plus, Joe Barksdale is a pretty good OT that can solidfy the RT while I can still draft a OT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kevin Greene Newbie

Kevin Greene

Posted
Posted

You didnt have much luck with it last year.

 

Midway through DCK's mock, 5-10 huddlers will quit already. By the time you start your, no one will want to do it.

 

 

Just want to get 2 or 3 rounds in, no stress, minimal prep necessary. 

Don't forget the draft isn't until May 8th this year.

Probably do mine 2 months after this one is done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kevin Greene Newbie

Kevin Greene

Posted
Posted

Wouldn't surprise me at all if the Rams fall in love with a QB and if he's available at #2 they take him and cut Bradford, would save $10 million in cap space and free them from the fail that is Sam Bradford. I think Long will stay even with the injury, though if the Rams don't like a QB and don't want a DE or WR, they could draft an OT and cut long or play Matthews at RT with Long at LT.

 

 

So eat the remainder of Bradfrod's contract, massive dead cap money all accelerated to 2014.

Gotta figure Bridgewater goes to Houston so you pass on Jadeveon Clowney for Johnny Football or Bortles?

Then besides the dead QB money you sign the rookie QB for ~ 4 yrs/25mill?

 

Yikes.

 

But OK, sure.

 

The Bradford contract just looks so bad because they were the last team to sign a #1 overall pre Rookie salray cap.

We got lucky with Cam the next year at about 40% of the cost.

Sucks to be the Rams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaCityKats Newbie

DaCityKats

Posted
  • Author
Posted

i will allow one cut out of those two. chuck has to choose between Bradford or Long, and C47 has to choose Dwill or Stewart. not both tho.considering the type of year the Texans had, i allowed those cuts because Schaub play was really bad, and Owen was in the final year of his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

i will allow one cut out of those two. chuck has to choose between Bradford or Long, and C47 has to choose Dwill or Stewart. not both tho.considering the type of year the Texans had, i allowed those cuts because Schaub play was really bad, and Owen was in the final year of his contract.

 

Im koo with that.

 

But, make sure that that goes for everyone, not just C47 and I.

 

You can only cut "one" big name player with a big contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Panthers HC Dave Canales hints at adding more weapons for QB Bryce Young

      By strato · Posted

      I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • Raskle
      2025 Draft Re-Grades (Or, One Idiot Doubles Down)

      By Raskle · Posted

      How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • Basbear
      Who was the better HC - Rivera or McDermott?

      By Basbear · Posted

      I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...