Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nebraska


cookinbrak

Recommended Posts

Because American Hustle had the stars, 12 Years a Slave had the subject matter, and Gravity had the cool special effects and Matthew McConaughey was just that good.

 

I was very underwhelmed by the three major contenders for Best Picture, and film in general in '13, and would have been happy with Nebraska or Dallas Buyers Club.  As for Best Actor, I think Dern was the second best, and almost as good, but McConaughey deserved the statue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some major hating going on here.

12 Years a Slave, American Hustle and Gravity were just as impressive.

 

I do not hate any of them.  They were decent movies, I would probably give each about a 7/10.  I just expect more from a Best Picture Contender/Winner, that does not mean I hate them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Dallas Buyers Club was the best. Best acting and a story that is still plaguing our country with the pharmaceutical companies. 12 years a slave was good but I think people felt guilty for not voting for it so it won. Dallas, Gravity and Hustle were all better.

Sent from my XT1049 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't mean in that fashion.

Look, it's conjecture. Many people thought Gravity was compelling and inspirational despite not featuring much of a 'plot'. Others thought 12 Years a Slave was filled with depth and sensational acting, and American Hustle was executed to perfection employing Jennifer's and Bradley's comedic-timing and Bale's charm.

So while they didn't 'wow' you per se, it wowed a good portion of people. I personally thought Alfonso Cuaron's Gravity was the best picture of the year. The cinematography, SFX/CGI, soundtrack, performances, etc were top-notch. It got a standing ovation in both of the showings I attended.

 

Yes they "wowed" people, but let us be honest, many in Hollywood bandwagon and piggyback their opinions based on those that came before them and the Oscar voting process is much more based on politics than it is on what film is actually the best.  That is just the way it is.  I knew the second the credits rolled that 12 Years a Slave was going to win because it is exactly the type of thing that they eat up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man is a political animal. So, yes, 70-80% of the time the best film doesn't technically win. The academy is composed of board members from a different generation after all. Oscar Bait will forever exist as well. That said, upcoming films like Chris Nolan's Interstellar will continue to break the mold.

 

Cannot wait for that one.  Nolan is one of the few out there that seems to understand that a great film can also be a blockbuster and vice versa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Watching those throws Drake Maye was making on a dead run threading lasers into tight coverage on the sidelines over and over in that game against the Bills... these people need to go watch that and be honest with themselves. And yeah, I'm a Heels fan but I'm specifically using Maye here because he's another young highly drafted QB not an established top tier player. Seems like a fair apples to apples comparison versus using a Mahomes or Allen.
    • why rig the scenario with the "as a passer" tag.   I mean, I assume you do that because Bryce needs help in the argument.  If we are just talking players and no contacts?   I mean, give me Young over Russell Wilson.   That's it.   I'd put him on par w/ Penix, Fields, McCarthy and Rattler,  so that's a wash.  Give me everyone else over Bryce.  And I'm not handicapping the other players as passing only because when you start doing that it's really meaningless.   
    • McCarthy to date, for sure. That's a very early sample size, however. Russell Wilson is a backup. Not sure Wilson wouldn't be better suited to our offense specifically, but at the bare minimum it's basically a wash. Hurts I would generally disagree with. I do think Hurts is likely to be less than stellar in our offense. Justin Fields - Agree. Fields is a significant threat on the ground but he sees the field as badly or worse than Bryce. And that's with significantly more reps. Spencer Rattler - I honestly thought this would be an easier call that it is. TBH, right now Rattler looks a lot better. Really almost across the board. Kyler - Murray is better. Basically across the board. Not significantly better, mind you. Trevor Lawrence is more debatable than it seems. Low completion percentages, tons of TO's.....he really has been quite bad this year in Jax. He is considerably more talented than Bryce but the results have been marginally better. Tua - Tua is a little more dynamic of a player but he is a TO machine. Tend to agree. Caleb Williams. Not sure on this. Williams is still struggling to be consistent but his upper end is WAY higher than Bryce. He shows it fairlu frequently, as well. Probably would rather be working through Caleb's issues than Bryce. Penix - 100%. This guy stinks. Cam Ward. This is a little tough. Again, far higher ceiling on Ward and he shows flashes but it's been a mess there in Tenn. Probably lean towards Bryce here.
×
×
  • Create New...