Growl

Oh okay, so that's what this is about You're looking at tom Brady and thinking he's going to play that long, but the truth he isn't going to Which means you're talking about using a top 10 pick on a window player whose already starting to find himself on the injury report for this or that and then this, and that too Well ran teams don't make that kind of desperation play

feels like a poor attempt to reframe the narrative surrounding Stafford, so let's make sure I get this post in so you can't go bumping this thread I and most everyone here think Matthew Stafford will have a great season, probably a couple even But the panthers aren't in need of a guy to give them a "couple good seasons," nor is it good football sense to blow a top 10 pick on a guy with that being the return The Rams are desperate to capitalize on their window Were still building the house

I think it bothers me none of you know he used to play for us

this could be said about the league as a whole and may mean the panthers don't need to trade up at all too far out to really get a sense of that yet

if we were willing to give up the 8th overall pick and then some for Matt Stafford it's a pretty good indicator of what were willing to spend for a QB I frankly wouldn't be surprised if tepper more or less offered Houston a blank check for Watson it sounds like you're talking more about what you want to do than what you think the team will do

Jared Goff is on a $100 million dollar contract they aren't taking a quarterback

Hahahahaha

Stop overreacting to little things one Washington win doesn't alter the teams intended offseason trajectory one pick behind Detroit doesn't mean we should willfully take a bad desperation deal that intentionally disadvantages us towards a conference rival

watching a ninth rate franchise like the Lions swindle us and then go get the QB we should've got while we pat ourselves on the back for taking the sloppy seconds they pawned off on us may genuinely be one of the lowest moments in the history of this team

what does this mean If Bridgewater negatively influenced the deal, they would simply remove Bridgewater from the equation cap space isn't important

if we gave up a top 10 pick for Matt Stafford we'd be the laughing stock of the division

actually those things are true

lol those guys have won super bowls Matthew Stafford has never won a playoff game

elite QBs can beat good teams

we really gonna let joe Brady push us into another guy who can help him audition for a job instead of a legitimate long term answer

Ideally he goes to LA for a Goff swap and we can take the Lions off the QB board

Person was on the radio talking about how much he personally likes Matt Stafford and wanted this to happen we see him drop one of these everytime the discussion starts to cool

why not just give away the pick so we don't have to deal with the pressure pf making it at all

note the careful wording "We have zero interest in trading deshaun Watson" is an appeal to Watson, not a declaration to the league, followed by some commentary on the importance of "open communication" Saying you have no interest implies you could obtain interest, if you truly had "zero interest," then your statement would be directed at the league: "we will not trade deshaun Watson" or even the tried and true "we have no plans to trade deshaun Watson" if you wanted something more in between

doesn't fit where we are at as an organization

I can't believe there are still people spelling ryan Kalils name wrong

this has got to be a parody account

there was a clear gap between Jones and Newman and then again between Newman and mond in that practice

so tom Brady was drafted in the 6th round huh

this is impressive in its own way