Panthers8969

“Tanking” means sucking on purpose to build up draft capital and or $ sounds like you just mean “sucking”

Tanking teams don’t trade away 1s

Yeah but we had Tommy T on the roster? It usually takes TEs time to develop and has historically been one of the slower developing positions. Why hinder TT’s development further by overpaying a JAG? Just cause? I’d rather have bad TEs for cheap than bad TEs for real $

I literally quoted you.

Bc she got that gawk gawk 9000

Maybe it’s bc I’ve thought hurts sucked for years but everyone seemed stoked we were getting him. 0 talent eval just “omg its not Ian Thomas !”

There’s literally no perfect time to be the worst team in the league without your first pick. What a wild thing to say

Hey, trust me, Ik Thomas sucks and was overpaid. The solution was not to pay another booty TE even more money. Especially when tremble was just drafted in the 3rd

Yall were so happy when we signed him lol

I mean seriously, why even make this topic? It's bad enough we dont have the pick we dont need to be reminded of all the different possibilities the bears have to become a real franchise as we stay dog poo with no picks. Usually bad teams cant stay bad for long bc of the draft but we found a way! cudos

RAS is heavily weighted (pun intended) by body weight. Mingo running a 4.46 is a solid time for sure, but that resulted in a 9.99 RAS speed score. Is he actually in the 99th percentile for speed in the league? No, of course not. And then his agility testing, like a lot of heavier WRs, just wasn’t good at all.

Clearly about Mingo lolol. I had a whole section about the nfl and instead of thinking maybe we’re talking about different players your conclusion is instead that I’m just that stupid. The college section, as you pointed out so eloquently, also makes no sense when applied to legette, but once again you conclude I’m just that dumb. Kind of funny isn’t it? You’re incapable of being wrong, so everyone is else.

Is this good? Seems… not good? https://x.com/devyeusuf/status/1754773478509777132?s=46

Let’s see: college: he never once led his own team in yards in college had most of his production come vs one poo team nfl: this needs to be explained??? 0 production can’t run routes runs out of bounds instead of catching perfectly thrown balls slightly above average speed but y’all act like he’s Tyreek hill

Same. I love the draft and half the time I go to watch players this year I just get pissed off we don’t have 1.01. Sucked all year and while most teams would then enjoy bountiful rewards in the offseason, we have nothing. Just more pain. Could’ve traded the 1.01 for an absolute haul. If only we just tanked 2022 and didn’t go on that late season run. We’d be so much better off it’s painful

He’s what Mingo is, not good

The one non WR I’d like at 33

If Bryce young sucks again next year we’ll have the 1.01 again. That’s the insurance

Boo hoo they have to report to the guy who signs their checks. Here’s a quick exercise to check if someone has to report to someone: can they be fired? If so, who can fire them? Tepper owns the team, no poo people report to him. Welcome to the real world

Higgins won’t be allowed to leave in FA. Mike Evans is more realistic with HC ties and age. Good young wrs aren’t allowed to walk. Last example was kirk who was a wr3 on the cardinals than got a contract wildly over expectations

Some recent “fixes” : josh Allen tua hurts howd they get fixed? Teams traded for a true wr1. Then boom, magically the QBs went from bust to good. Crazy how that works

The bears could forfeit the pick entirely, draft a long snapper first overall. Literally nothing to do with what we gave up

What the bears do is completely irrelevant. Wake up

Honestly can’t even believe this poo is real. 1.01 in 2024 for 1.01 2023 in in of itself is a trade rape. Yet we threw in so much more. fug me

1. Posting the list of top receivers just proves late round picks CAN HIT and speaks nothing of probability, which was a core theme of my OP. 2. I agree, 5 years does exclude people. It was a somewhat arbitrary number chosen bc I) 5 is clean ii) over 30 wrs were drafted during this time, meaning the sample is recognized as statistically significant iii) I don’t have an unlimited amount of time to go back to 1960 Iv) the modern nfl is different from where it was 10 years ago and college is different too. The more recent rounds are also the most pertinent. 3. The conclusion (that it’s unlikely a day 2 wr pans out) would almost certainly be unchained even if I went back X years. Maybe the average changes to 28%, etc. it’s still unlikely whenever you aggregate multiple draft classes to derive conclusions. Of course, not every class is equal though - this would play into the “luck” element