Jump to content

WUnderhill

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    3,574
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WUnderhill

  1. Makes sense if they are equally happy with either Young or Stroud, and Texans are all in on one. I’m sure they have an idea what the Texans offered for #1. If they could trade back to 2 and pick up the Texans 2nd rd pick (33 overall) and still get their guy, that would be a coup. Essentially trading DJ Moore, 2024 1st, 2025 2nd, and moving up from 61 to 33 for the #2 overall. That would be pretty nuts. I will say I do think Young is worth sticking at 1 and drafting.
  2. Well it seems to have saved us our 2025 1st rd pick and maybe another mid round pick, so not the worst. Would rather we had DJ for our new QB but it is what it is. Bryce Young come on down!
  3. Ok, now tell us how many QBs are drafted in the first round and what is the % of success of those QBs compared to the % of all other QBs. I don’t think it will support your point but who are we kidding you’ll cherry pick whatever you can find that supports your world view, no matter how flawed. Just like you think saying 52 of 107 QBs to make it to a championship game were not first rd QBs supports not drafting a first rd QB. That’s actually a huge argument in favor of first round QBs lol.
  4. Imagine trading away Cam Newton for Jake Locker, Andy Dalton, Brandon Weeden, Brock Osweiler, EJ Manuel, and Geno Smith. Surely there’s a better chance of one of those guys working out than a legit blue chip prospect!
  5. What kind of backward ass logic is this?
  6. I like Kincaid the best if we’re looking for a pass catcher. Washington is the best blocker.
  7. What if some jackass runs a red light and tbones me on the way to work?
  8. If we had some fat college donkey and his college coaching staff I’d be more worried about that. This coaching staff in this division won’t be picking in the t10 even if we roll with Darnold for another year, and the 2 QBs everybody wants are going top 3-5 unless they have terrible seasons and turn into pumpkins in which case we won’t want them anyways.
  9. Will “Kunkel”? More like Will “Not My Uncle” so don’t touch me there. Am I right?
  10. I know you guys won’t believe me, but I’ve got a feeling the Bears might be interested in trading the #1 pick. You heard it here first.
  11. Only interested if the Bears swap with Texans and stay at 2.
  12. I really just want Young or Stroud, would be happy with either. I’m a bit higher on Young but Stroud has a lot to like too. Wouldn’t want to trade up for Richardson but if he’s there at 9 sure.
  13. I was trying to read why they included Lamar Jackson without making a snarky comment about “free agents”, but the pop up demanding I sign up for their website is cancer.
  14. Or maybe he’s an oft injured QB who has never come close to duplicating his MVP performance and wants a record breaking and risky (especially for an oft injured QB) contract. And on top of that a team has to give up 2 first round picks. But collusion gets more clicks.
  15. That was a 7 year contract. I think he got like 8mil/yr. I doubt Lamar would be too happy with that.
  16. I said “hard pass” I don’t know how that is not admitting I don’t want him. Also, seems like pretty much the whole NFL agrees with me.
  17. He was an MVP 4 years ago and he’s pretty much performed worse in every statistical category each year since then and hasn’t played a full season since 2020. I don’t really get the narrative. Hard pass on trading 2 firsts plus the contract. I’d be down for signing him to the right deal if he were a free agent, but he’s not.
  18. Even if you could say for certain that he has more risk of injury on a hit by hit basis, his ability to take less hits and less big hits isn’t something you can ignore. Let’s say he takes one “significant” hit every 50 hits, and some 6’3 QB takes one “significant” hit every 25 hits. And let’s say for the sake of the example that Young gets injured on every “significant” hit, while the other QB gets injured for every 2 “significant” hits. Well then they get injured exactly the same amount. But then what if the 6’3 QB also takes twice as many hits. Well then all of a sudden the 6’3 QB is more likely to get injured. These are obviously all made up numbers, but it’s just to illustrate that it is possible to have a skill set that reduces risk of injury, and Bryce has that skill set without question. It’s just a matter of does the skill set make up for the size. I think it’s closer to a wash with these other QBs than some people think. And just for note, I was on the “don’t want Young because of his size” train until just a couple weeks ago when I really started watching him and learning about him. What I see is a skill set that offsets the size concern and then you get all his other elite attributes on top of that. I was hoping he would come in more in the 5’11-6ft range at the combine, but nobody was surprised at the 5’10.
×
×
  • Create New...