kungfoodude

Well, he made JJ McCarthy look pretty good is all I will say.

That facemask was such BS. Lol

I don't think it has much to do with that. You just can't keep increasing the amount of games without this being inevitable. fug PS spots, the NFLPA should push for larger game day rosters the next time 18 games comes up.

He is going to have to change considerably from what he was in college for him to become a long term NFL starter.

Baker's injury severely hurts their chances.

I would feel bad for KC's OL injury luck if we literally hadn't had more of it.

Also, can the Sanders stans just fuging chill? I say that as a guy that had him as the #2 QB in this class but ya'll are obsessed to an unhealthy level.

Man....he was really, really, REALLY bad in his start.

It also REALLY fugs up the Colts future plans.

Garrett may break the NFL record today. Lol

It really sucks. It was nice to see his career resurgence there.

I think it's easier to accept some sort of alternate scenario that doesn't involve realizing your coaching staff and front office is just plain stupid.

I don't think it's coddling, I think it's straight denial.

Riley Leonard absolutely cannot get the Jags defenders to accept these INT's he is throwing.

So Anthony Richardson is the 3rd stringer in Indy? Woof. Have to assume they move on from him in the offseason.

poo, I missed it. Did he get carted off?

Was "Nine" the career starts before a good one from JJ McCarthy?

I think you are making a lot of assumptions based on what we the fans see and putting that on our FO and coaching staff. Those two groups haven't really impressed me very much in the ability to recognize personnel and roster flaws in a timely fashion. If I had to guess, I would be we are going to find out that a pretty big chunk of that same FO and coaching staff are very bullish on moving forward in 2026 with Bryce. Believe me, I hope I am wrong but I think the wins have them ignoring the obvious situation.

It doesn't logically make sense that Notre Dame is left out if you had them ranked ahead Miami last week. Per usual, it has nothing to do with "who is better than who" its purely politics and money that decides college football playoffs, bowls, etc. There is no justification because they are essentially admitting their previous rankings were bunk.

What strategy is involved in casually watching football games, may I ask?

I mean he isn't really wrong in a certain sense. Usually jobs are attached to big QB decisions(coaching or FO) so it's less likely for an entrenched starter to lose that job unless it is by some other factor(extremely poor play, contract situation, coaching/FO change/direction, etc). If the FO or coaching staff think they have their QB, they aren't likely to give another QB a serious shot unless the situation can threaten their jobs. The NFL is still about winning but personnel decisions can still end up being a bit beauracratic or certainly political. We see it even on the current team outside of Bryce.

Disagree. I hope JMU and Tulane win. I will never, ever, ever root for an SEC or Big Ten team over anyone after the way they ruined college athletics.

Yeah, I hate em both but it's what is best.

Yeah, I think after Bryce the Evero situation is the most interesting one for us headed into the offseason.

And even Brown has been more disappointing than I expected. I was more amped about that signing than Wharton. He has been fairly middling, TBH.