Mother Grabber

can't wait for September!

are they all drinking that gatorade, or is it just cheesy product placement?

sounds like he's a mid round steal bases on combine numbers, but a late round flyer project based on skill and effort.

the way this has gone, that seems like last offseason.

don't let him leave without a contract Getts!

#1 overall pick won't be there.

isn't their entire uniform effectively their logo?

they'd look awesome in an all black uniform.

winter is coming...

I've never spent $3M in a year at Target.

this made me lol:

1 yr, according to Rotowerld

contrary to poopular opinion on here, signing Jennings, or not, will have no affect on which, if any, WR(s) we draft. Jennings being on the roster does not 'allow' us to draft a WR in the 3-4 round, nor does it restrict us from drafting one in the 1st or 2nd. We will draft who we draft based on their value as a football player, and not based on our current roster. Jennings is likely a 1-2 year player at best. changing our draft based on a player with such a short life on the team is extremely short sighted.

oh, mrsa me!

he must not have read the thing that said he was the 4th worst receiver for drop % last year.

can't imagine why no one wants to give him $9M/year. 3 seems like a stretch. So many better players in the draft.

I wouldn't even offer him a rookie salary. do not want lazy underachievers.

seems Crabby Patty turned down 3M from the dolphins. I wonder if he's taking state taxes into account...

worked wonders for the Raiders...oh, wait

a currency exchange rate of $0.25 should be noted...but it's still $100K worth of booze.

Gettleman will not 'change' as our cap situation improves. Gettleman is not cheap. He is fiscally responsible. He knows what he has to spend, and he knows what he has to pay for. He gets FA at value, and doesn't over spend. As we have more money, he will be able to get higher priced FA, but he will still be responsible, and get them at value. When we have more money, he will continue to be fiscally responsible, he will continue to get good value out of players and he will continue to not overspend to satisfy his, or anyone else's ego. Paying a RB $50m isn't trying, it's being a bad GM and mis-managing your team. When you have a team filled with contracts that are appropriate for the player, and add to it a constant stream of high value talent from the draft, that's how you properly manage team personnel. he isn't trying to build a one and done like Taints did. He's building a dynasty that will be deep in the playoffs every year.

what about my welcome? doesn't that matter to you? ever since I got pregnant, you've taken me for granite!

there's no one in the division who will pose a legitimate threat to the Panthers three-peat. Seems unlikely they they won't be there.

helps to be a Texas AM fan to get that one.