CRA

we do not need to give up 4 first round picks plus additional picks.....for a lotto ticket. That’s not being aggressive. That’s dumb. there is plenty to like about Wilson but he is being mind boggling overhyped at this point.

Teddy made sense to get the O up and running in a COVID world. And he makes sense to draft a QB to teach it to. Hence the 2 year deal. Lance isn’t going to be a fit for it. Which is fine. But we need a new scheme IMO for Lance to thrive.

I don’t think Trey Lance and Joe Brady are a fit. we will need a new scheme if people want to see Trey Lance this year.

so 100% drafting Fields or Lance to sit to start off the season.

PJ started a game. Only 1 start. Made some real plays...and we actually won. Walker did more with his starting opportunity than Grier.

PJ “ All wins, no losses” Walker!!

I’d rather have Trask. Not that I want him. But if we are now resorting to this tier. Give me the FL kid over Mond.

Wilson isn’t worth 4-5 first rounders

Give me Mr XFL over Will

The “watch” part confuses me. The outcome may be preferred.

More probably. They gave up 3 first round picks. Our point differential is even bigger to get to 2.

We can throw away all these draft valuation charts and point talk. Meaningless at this point.

That too much IMO. Glad it wasn’t us

for awhile I was pretty certain a QB would get to 8. I flip flop on it. Earlier I just though the media was overhyping it because QBs are just more fun to talk about and get clicks. 4 in the top 10 is pretty high. You don't see that. And we aren't dealing w/ 4 Trevors.

I just don't see a division rival trading to knowingly allow a division rival to take a QB high. If they hit, you basically have a decade of owning that.

stinks the Falcons are in our division. I could see them trading back. But not to us.

NFL draft history is pretty clear that the media consensus doesn't set the board's for all the teams. Jets could easily draft Justin Fields. That then puts Wilson in play. I could see Carolina trading up. I just don't see it being w/ the Jets. Jets are going to get a QB IMO pending a team isn't willing to be so dumb they can't refuse.

Teddy is above average at taking what a defense will give him.

Okay. But the top 10 list is pretty fluid year to year isn't? At least the names the round out a top 10 each year. I mean you know certain folks will be there. Aaron Rodgers. Maybe 2nd one year. 3rd the next. He will have a spot. Like a Mahomes. But it is still fluid outside of like a group of 5-6 fixtures. Then you can have Cam, Baker, Lamar, Allen, Goff, etc. In one year, out the next.

Can we extend the range out to top 10-15? Because the top 10-15 is very fluid....and part of that is because the team/scenario around them dictates it. I can imagine many the top 10 sucking when in bad spots vs good. A prime Mahomes, Rodgers, Brees, Manning, Wilson, etc will find a way. So basically HOFers can generally find a way not to suck. I'll say that.

last year was pretty close but the draft almost never unfolds as predicted. Who knows what we will have looking at us at 8.

Same is true largely for QBs. Tom Brady does you no good without an OL and the proper weapons. If you have an OL and weapons? Brady makes a massive difference. You got a DL? A dude like Luke will give you a top D. That's my take. Not 100% the same but similar in nature.

Because both teams let the talent on those units go to poo. I mean, you still need a DL in front of Luke.

well, if we can't solve the QB puzzle this year.....solving the defensive front 7 puzzle does seem like a worthy investment. Cam Newton wouldn't of had his success those season without those dominant fronts.