ForJimmy

I'd be more than ok with this. Run a similar RPO he ran in college and slowly incorporate more throughout the season.

Yeah he has had more chances than any young QB I can think of. If Corral isn't ready and we have no other options then fine let him play some games until we have a better option. Outside of that is should be Corral's job to lose at this point.

They picked up his option after the draft on April 30th, 2021. It had nothing to do with his practice and was more because they didn't draft a QB and were overconfident they could "fix" Darnold. They have been chasing every QB available since last season ended meaning their opinions have changed.

I kind of like Kiffin. He is doing great at Ole Miss where his teams have been outclassed with some SECW juggernauts. The Raiders thing was a mess to begin with and he was pretty openly against drafting Jamarcus Russell number 1, but it's what ownership wanted. Not to mention rookies got paid stupid money back then.

Kiffin next??

I can’t believe that news! I woke up so hungover today from it I thought it was a dream…

I said IT'S GREAT. TO BE. A CAROLINA PANTHERS!!!!

If Sam wasn't so bad I might agree. It's making the offense unwatchable which is making it hard for these younger offensive players to develop. Baker would provide some stability there and who knows if he turns out to be the guy or a placeholder for Corral or our next draft pick? I think the point is minimal risk for a definite better option with the slightest potential to be our franchise guy or hold down the position until our franchise QB is ready. I could take it or leave it depending on how Corral looks in camp. If we play our cards right the comp for Baker leaving in FA could be higher than the pick we give up for him...

Umm you must have not heard the breaking news. It's a GREAT day!!!

Hell yeah! Best day EVER as a Panther's fan! Who else is pumped?!?!?

Never stop trying @4Corners!! I have faith in you.

But I was promised a GREAT day?!?!?!

Anyone seen that eggshell penis lately? Asking for a friend... @jackson113@USDepartmentOfSavagery PS We need to verify this with Garry Cobb!

OK now you have gone too far!!

It may look like next year's 5th, a future 4th, and Sam Darnold for Baker with each team paying the new player's salary. It helps us unload Sam and gives Cleveland a backup plus some future picks. Baker is our immediate starter and there is less pressure on getting Corral on the field early in the season. Just throwing a scenario out there...

"Mild interest" would be the key phrase. If we can upgrade our QB from bottom of the league to mid-tier for some later round picks then I'm not 100% against it. So far we have shown good restraint and aren't budging unless we get a deal that makes financial and long term sense. There is always a chance that a younger QB like Baker could turn out even better over here especially if he stays healthy. Plus he is on his last year so if he doesn't wow us we can let him walk.

Right? I mean right now we have Sam Darnold and a 3rd round rookie. I would hope we would have mild interest in most QBs that are possibly available.

It's definitely a strong argument to be made, however the question is where are we drafting this next QBs. If we start drafting QBs in the first round before we can fully develop any then it can become an issue. I have no problem drafting one in the 3rd-4th plus range, but I would hate to use our first each year especially when the issue might be our staffing putting them in positions to succeed.

PJ Walker coming up soon!!!