Jump to content

ForJimmy

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    19,908
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ForJimmy

  1. I mean we were 500 under Wilks? Granted it was an easy schedule, but add a QB and a better staff plus giving them an offseason to prepare... I could see next year being a learning curve with new schemes and a rookie QB, but after that we should be in decent shape to compete.
  2. I definitely understand where you are coming from. I’d prefer we not use the 25 first if at all possible and maybe just move up to 3. It’s all just speculation at this point anyway.
  3. I don’t. I think if our staff wants a top 3 talented prospect at the QB position that is the cost for it. They can hope another Mahomes or Jackson gets overlooked in a draft and they can develop that player also. I just think they are wanting to start this whole QB development process this year. Maybe they sign Carr tomorrow and this is all for nothing who knows?
  4. If you are investing all that money in Carr I think we would use the picks for weapons to help him excel. Drafting a QB could also piss him off. It would be VERY aggressive though!
  5. That 1 can have a bigger impact than the other 3 especially if the next two years aren’t top 10 picks. It’s Cam’s impact vs Brown/Horn/CMC plus two later 1st round picks like Shaq or Benjamin. QBs are just that valuable anymore. I know you have to still build a team around them and missing those next 2 firsts will impact that greatly. The good news is we should be able to sign FAs with a rookie pay scale QB and out cleared up cap space the next two years.
  6. Yeah it’s a big loss, but it’s also an opportunity to add a staff-viewed top talented QB. Something (in theory) we won’t be in a position to do for a long time assuming our staff does it’s thing. That’s unfortunately the opportunity cost.
  7. Tepper was high on Fields for his draft. Maybe you are remembering that? There was a rumor he was high on Levis but that was before last season.
  8. Williams and Foreman seem very similar. I’d prefer whoever costs less.
  9. Yeah that Crown guy seems legit. I think he called the Thomas Brown hire the day before it happened as well...
  10. Most high round rookie QBs get 3 years if not more to prove themselves though right? Unless they completely struggle like Zach Wilson who still might be playing into his third year unless they find someone else...
  11. Maybe she thought we were getting Carr or just wanted to try a different approach? Who cares? If you think she doesn't have a real source then just ignore her? If she does have any connections I would like to keep hearing from her on here without people trolling.
  12. Last I heard she was writing articles for one of the sports sites. Panthers Wire I think?
  13. Yes they both did their parts as drawn up by Daboll and his staff. No one carried that offense…. The offense kind of ran through Barkley TBH. Jones had a decent year too, but Barkley finally being healthy played a big part in that.
  14. Lol Jones “carried” that offense?? Anyone heard of Saquon Barkley??
  15. I mean it has to matter where the 23 first is right? A top 10 pick should require less extra than a lower first round pick…
  16. Ohio St doesn’t think Stroud is as good as Fields? Like the whole university thinks that??
  17. If we can’t find a spot for Chinn on our new defense, does he become part of the trade? I could also see 9, the CMC picks, plus Burns to get it done. If you swap Burns for Chinn it will take next year’s first also plus possibly more.
  18. Who is calling Chicago tomorrow?
  19. Then the Ravens will probably draft a QB before us with that pick.
  20. If we trade up for a QB, I hope we keep pick 39 for a TE.
  21. Ok I was confused because someone ranked his performance. Maybe him weighing over 200 helped his stock?
×
×
  • Create New...