csx

This is as relevant as a batted or underthrown Bryce Young pass.

Not the year to be year to be paying this type of player IMO. But as we now know we aren't on his radar with a rookie QB. Probably 2 years away from something like this if Young pans out as we hope

It's enlightening to see people admit they are just happy to have sunshine blown up their ass.

His list of teams didn't reflect that sentiment. The only serious contenders of the 9 he listed are Bills and Eagles. It was predominantly related to personal connections.

Genius or Idiot? Depends if he likes your teams players or not.

I'm just speculating but I just assume he doesn't really want to play and that's why he isn't. Cam isn't stupid or desperate.

I can't believe I was sold Baker Mayfield being something to be excited about and we just had to make a deal happen.

He would have been on any number of NFL rosters if he wanted to and all would be infinity better options than whatever this is or XFL

This year is Pad Prik Gang Moo Shin when previous years were obviously Khao Pad Moo Kai Dao Mai Suk

I think it's fair to debate the parameters but it does serve a purpose and this purpose has been the justification of expanding rosters....not limiting them as some here are suggesting. Players not being cut or put on IR or being forced to play injured because of a teams disadvantage in available players any given week serves the players best interest. I don't see why NFLPA would want to get rid of that. It benefits players.

Read this article https://www.hogshaven.com/2020/6/20/21296520/why-does-the-nfl-have-inactive-players-on-game-day

Read my above post or read some of the more eloquently written explanations online

It benefits the players more than anyone

Nothing has changed in regards to the reason it exists. It's as valid now as ever.

The point of the inactive list is due to injuries. It allows for each team to have the same number of available players. If one team has 8 injured players and the other none then there is less pressure for teams to play guys who aren't ready to return. It creates a status for injured players that is between playing and off the roster.

I don't believe the team has made any concrete decisions about him at this point. Reich said they want to see what they have in him and he will likely get significant playing time in preseason. I take them at their word.

If you are going to start them you forfeit any right to complain about them

Good lord, lighten up

I believe if you read any article explaining the rule your fears would subside.

Why? It means they can't play just like any other time a backup needs to come in.

Agree. Getting sensitive and bothered by it just promotes others to harp on it more. They know it's getting under your skin

Yes, they've been saying that for months.

You know

Florio drama machine

You are really struggling trying to comprehend