-
Posts
91,221 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by LinvilleGorge
-
Kyle Pitts as a WR/TE Good for Carolina ?
LinvilleGorge replied to Leotiger's topic in Carolina Panthers
I think Pitts is a helluva prospect. Probably the most dynamic TE prospect since Vernon Davis. With that said... we need a fuging QB. He'd be a waste if we don't address that. #8 needs to be about a QB. Either drafting one or trading for assets to get a QB next year. -
I never cared for Darnold as a draft prospect and nothing has changed my opinion on him so far in the NFL. Maybe he will resurrect his career elsewhere, bit I'd greatly prefer to look draft first.
-
That's what I had. Never again. Not even for free.
-
Yep. I agree, Jones is the Subaru pick. I had a Subaru as a company provides vehicle. Simply awful. It's impressive to create a vehicle that is so bad at everything.
-
Yeah, it wasn't intended as a knock. That's a damn good living.
-
Maybe someone will take him there but I'm definitely not seeing a lot to work with in terms of a starter. I could definitely see him being one of those 10+ year career backups who have spot starting appearances in the mold of a Derek Anderson.
-
If we want to run this style of defense we better find us an Earl Thomas type of FS.
-
This isn't even clever trolling at this point.
-
It's way too early in the day to be this drunk. You're all over the place.
-
Great college QB. 100%. Zero argument. Not a great NFL prospect. There's a big difference. You're caught up in your feels because he plays for your favorite college team.
-
No you weren't. You specifically tried to talk about "measurables". His lack of measurables is why a great college QB is going to end up being a mid-round pick.
-
Measurables? LOL! Trask has a noodle arm and concrete blocks for feet.
-
The only way we're getting #4 from a division rivals is if they feel like they're absolutely fleecing us. It would probably take an RG3 type trade.
-
Cool.
-
Drafting Trask earlier than the 4th would be a reach. Trading back into the 1st to draft him probably gets you fired before the 2nd round starts.
-
Taking a TE in the top 10 and drafting KYLE TRASK with a trade up into the late 1st? I think Fitterer wants to keep his job at least until he can make it to the regular season.
-
Go on record. Who still wants Watson?
LinvilleGorge replied to Sasquatch's topic in Carolina Panthers
One thing is for sure, you very rarely see a prospect of this caliber as the 3rd QB off the board. If we've identified him as the guy, I'm fine with trading up to get him. -
I'm fine with trading up if we've identified a specific target. If we stay at 8 and the "big four" are gone, trade down is by far and away my #1 option with the ultimate goal of getting an additional 1st next year. We're going to be in the same boat again if needing a QB, we'll need all the draft ammo we can get.
-
Go on record. Who still wants Watson?
LinvilleGorge replied to Sasquatch's topic in Carolina Panthers
If rings are the only standard then you're implying a lot of great players weren't good enough. -
Go on record. Who still wants Watson?
LinvilleGorge replied to Sasquatch's topic in Carolina Panthers
If we could get Stafford talent level we'd be trading up for sure. Dude was a former #1 overall pick who has thrown for over 45k yards and nearly 300 TDs and you're implying that would be settling? LOL! -
It would be $10M next year. After that Watson is probably either banned or this is all in the past and he's on the field
-
Taking on that salary? The salary would've been the least of our worries. That trade haul we gave up on the other hand...
-
I'm tired of getting reports about this thread. If one of the other mods wants to open it back up that's fine but it's done for now.
-
Deshaun's "game" may have something to do with his current situation. You're off the rails on this one my dude.
-
In that situation, my far and away best option available would be to trade down and try to pickup an additional 1st next year. We may need it to make a move next year for a QB because guess what, we're basically going to be in the same situation which is the situation of needing a QB. If we can't do that, them yeah, LT or CB would be the best absolute worst fuging case scenarios available to us. Half-ass it for Howell mode in full effect.
