Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettleman on Boston "He sets a tone, he's a very physical player"


Zod

Recommended Posts

I wasn't referring to both offense and defense..  the offense has actually been a bright spot although I guess there's always room for improvement.

 

my point that wasn't disproved is the defense faced a lot of injuries and brought on a few walkons as starters..  which the topic I thought we were discussing was all the 4 and 5 stars on defense that should have made Boston look better.

 

It doesn't really matter how many stars they have when they are wasted in a vanilla scheme.  You are acting like the team was devoid of talent.  Chapel Hill has alot of young players in the league that were drafted early.  Now they are contributors in better more elaborate schemes.  I believe Boston will be better once he is in our system. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't really matter how many stars they have when they are wasted in a vanilla scheme.  You are acting like the team was devoid of talent.  Chapel Hill has alot of young players in the league that were drafted early.  Now they are contributors in better more elaborate schemes.  I believe Boston will be better once he is in our system. 

 

regardless of how you feel about the scheme...  I'm saying they were starting walk-ons due to injuries (and young bucks without much experience) and you're saying they were all 4 and 5 star talents...  I haven't said anything more than that actually and felt your statement wasn't accurate.  That is all.

 

I think we both agree on putting him in a different scheme could show dividends.  Apparently Rivera and co feel that way too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you should see the OP for pretty big reasons why that is a completely incorrect take given this is a Dave Canales team.
    • TMac is a good player and would've been the right pick if our QB could throw a ball farther than 40 yards. For this team's current build (run first, game management passing attack) and the fact that our TE's are laughably bad - the five on our roster have combined for less than 600 yards total, with 3 TDs - Warren should've been the pick. 
    • If anyone feels like they can't have a conversation about Bryce Young nearly three full seasons into his career maybe assess why and how these conversations end this way instead of looking to shoot the messenger. Why is it okay to label anyone else on the team or coaching staff trash? Folks on the huddle and across the fanbase on social media have fully thrown anyone and everyone including rookie 8th overall pick TMac fully under the bus multiple times this season. But some of you guys apparently expect a pat on the back because Bryce Young successfully evaded a few potential sacks while Tyler Shough got consumed by our pass rush throughout the game and still had a superior performance. The state of this division is hilariously mediocre at best. Bryce Young is the only player on this roster who is allowed to have the lowest bar possible yet we have invested the most resources in him. It's lunacy.
×
×
  • Create New...