Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Kerr spurns Jackson/Knicks Takes Warriors Job


Recommended Posts

In a shocking turn of events, Steve Kerr has decided to take the job as the head coach of the Golden State Warriors leaving the New York Knicks wondering, "what went wrong."

 

The Knicks were shoe-in's in the race for Kerr as GSW had already started looking at other candidates (Lionel Hollins), but apparently Kerr and the Knicks couldn't agree on the length of the contract.

 

So with out further ado, here is the coach of the Golden State Stephen Curry's...

 

75879085.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't matter how long his contract is unless it's guaranteed money. Think Kerr will regret is decision within a year or two.

Maybe he felt coaching for the Knicks he would just be Jackson's puppet. Whoever the Knicks next coach is I really think it will be one of Jackson's former players. Only people with extensive Triangle Offense experience should apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think Kerr will regret is decision within a year or two.

 

Why?  Even with Lee, Curry and Igoudala still on the books, the Warriors will be about $10-12 million under the cap going in to the off season and the Knicks, assuming Anthony doesn't exercise his ETO, are $30 million over.  Even if Anthony does exercise his ETO, they'll still be over the cap and stuck with Stoudemire, Chandler, Bargnoni, and Felton.

The Knicks situation is a long-term rebuilding project, not a great place for a first time head coach to land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? Even with Lee, Curry and Igoudala still on the books, the Warriors will be about $10-12 million under the cap going in to the off season and the Knicks, assuming Anthony doesn't exercise his ETO, are $30 million over. Even if Anthony does exercise his ETO, they'll still be over the cap and stuck with Stoudemire, Chandler, Bargnoni, and Felton.

The Knicks situation is a long-term rebuilding project, not a great place for a first time head coach to land.

What exactly did Mark Jackson do wrong there. Win games?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That front office is clearly of the mindset that they need to win playoff series and do it now and didn't feel like Jackson was the coach to do it for them.  That's why I questioned the Kerr hire in the first place.  It doesn't make a ton of sense to go with another rookie head coach when it appears that the team just needed a little more polish on top of what Jackson accomplished.

 

From Kerr's perspective though, it's really a no brainer.  If you take the Knicks job, you're only there because you're Phil's guy and the media questions when Phil is going to come down out of the front office and take the reigns from you if you're struggling, which, no doubt, will happen next year because that team is terrible.  In Golden State, he has a chance to take over a very talented roster and put the finishing touches on a championship caliber team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess all NBA announcers are the most qualified people for coaches. Guess with them pointing out how your doing everything wrong night in and night out owners have wised up that these are the best individuals for the job. Hehe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess all NBA announcers are the most qualified people for coaches. Guess with them pointing out how your doing everything wrong night in and night out owners have wised up that these are the best individuals for the job. Hehe

I suppose the Lakers will eventually pursue hometown guy Reggie Miller. I doubt the Knicks would ever want him...cough*spike lee*cough
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With Freddie Slavin and Svech both playing at MVP levels, no one can touch us. Burns playing well.  Imagine if Jarvy and Aho get going…
    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
×
×
  • Create New...