Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

with ginn gone who is our new kr/pr guy?


Recommended Posts

A RB's ability in pass protection is vital to the amount of time they get on the field.

 

It helps but its not the most valued asset to have. plent of rbs cant block for crab but see plenty of time. and my point was you have to have more than being a decent blitz pick up guy to make the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the hell did the Panthers get Noel Divine? 

 

Yes a rookie who didn't show much in college either which is why he went in the 6th round and likely undrafted if we didn't take him.

...umm...Barner and Gaffney were very productive in college. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It helps but its not the most valued asset to have. plent of rbs cant block for crab but see plenty of time. and my point was you have to have more than being a decent blitz pick up guy to make the team.

 

Well 1,700 yards rushing and 21 TD's in a season is nothing to sniff at. If you want to be in there on 3rd downs you better be able to block for your QB. DeAngelo noted it as a big reason why he didn't get on the field more as a rookie, his pass blocking was sub par.

 

Gaffney came from a power running team running a pro offense. I think they saw more in him than his ability to pick up blitzes but its obviously an asset they'd rather him have than not. I think there was a reason Gman specifically mentioned it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the kickoff rules the way they are these days, it's not really that important anymore.

 

Not true at all, having good special teams play took an average offense to the super bowl many a times. 

 

Every yard counts, and the threat of a guy who can take it all the way at any moment is beneficial beyond even if he touches the ball or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wrote in another thread with PFR stats that Ginn was actually very middle of the pack for us on returns. So long as the next guy doesn't fumble, I really don't care about explosiveness, because the differential in field position from the decent return guys and the mediocre return guys wasn't all that great when I looked it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wrote in another thread with PFR stats that Ginn was actually very middle of the pack for us on returns. So long as the next guy doesn't fumble, I really don't care about explosiveness, because the differential in field position from the decent return guys and the mediocre return guys wasn't all that great when I looked it up.

I get what you are saying, yards wise. But man, to me, there is nothing like having a legit threat back there. Especially on PR. When you have a scary cat back there teams do some pretty silly things trying to keep the ball out of his hands. And sometimes those silly things backfire.

So to me, ball security is important, but having a guy that can do some actual damage helps.

And to micnificent28. If you can't block, you ain't seeing the field. You become a liability if you can't hold up back there. I read an article last year where Tolbert helped Barner out a lot with this. So yeah, it be important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...