Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Most Irreplaceable Defenders - Kuechly #2


updownsigma

Recommended Posts

No. Just don't use intelligent. You don't know someone is intelligent until you communicate with them for a prolong period of time. How the hell can you tell a guy standing on a grass field is intelligent? Kuechly is dumb!

 

And how exactly can you tell he's dumb when you've never met or communicated with him for a prolonged time?  You don't see how ignorant your blanket statement is?  I guess my doctor, who by all means seems extremely intelligent, is actually dumber than a potato because he trains in MMA during his free time.  Damn, guess I better switch doctors then.

 

Don't worry, I'm sure no one will ever mistake you for intelligent.  Anyone communicating with you for a prolonged period can tell rather quickly you're a fuging idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can assume he's based on his profession. Just hate people selling the intelligent nonsense when it comes to certain players. An athlete's job is to be athletic. That's it.

 

Stereotyping people according to external factors...

 

We refer to that as "prejudice".

 

That's what you're practicing, and defending.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not practicing anything. Don't wanna hear that smart Kuechly nonsense. If his intelligence is emphasize that would imply the other 52 players aren't.

 

That's like saying that calling Cam Newton tall means you're implying everyone else is short :rolleyes:

 

And yes, you're being prejudiced.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing abstract about someone's height. Intelligence is very subjective.

And yet somehow you, by your own statement, can "assume he's not intelligent based on his profession". Which, by the way, also means you assume that Cam Newton and Kelvin Benjamin must not be intelligent either since they're in the same profession.

I could suggest to you that you might want to think before you type next time, but we both know that's not going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I accept them as athletes. I don't need to add an additional label to them to respect them. Emphasizing a specific player is intelligent would entail the rest aren't. That's what people around here has been doing. Don't make this about me. I don't care who is smart or not.

 

Using that logic, emphasizing that this statement is really dumb would imply that the rest aren't.

 

Unfortunately, they are :unsure:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce has improved each season, fwiw, statistically.  His slope is rising.  (Not to say I am high on him--I am not, but I have not given up on him--nor have I given up on XL, but damn he pisses me off)  CJ's slope is descending.   I was never a Penix fan.  Never, I say!    
    • That is definitely the down side of all this--on paper, I would offer up a second rounder for him if he passed my interviews.  He has already gone through (seriously?) a treatment program for gambling addiction.  I just see him as a first round talent that we could get with a second rounder.  If I liked Bryce and felt good about paying him $50m per, I would not touch Sorsby.  If Bryce regresses or stays the same--he is going to expect to be paid.  Sorsby, in my view, has a better long-term future as an NFL QB.  He is big, mobile, has good arm strength, and makes wise decisions (on the field) with the football.  He is a great dual threat, RPO QB.   I think he is a perfect solution for the backup qb position and insurance for Bryce should he get injured or suck.  Pickett?  King?  yikes. 
    • Hard to say--they are very unpredictable--this article came out last night---after our comments:  (ESPN)   How has the NFL approached NCAA players with gambling violations in the past? David Purdum, sports betting reporter: Quarterback Hunter Dekkers and wide receiver Kayshon Boutte were found to have committed gambling violations while playing college football, and both were allowed to pursue NFL careers. Dekkers was the projected starting quarterback at Iowa State but was ruled ineligible ahead of the 2023 season after an investigation found he had bet on at least one game involving the Cyclones (among other wagers that violated NCAA bylaws). The bet was just $15 on Iowa State to beat Oklahoma State in a 2021 game in which he did not play, but it led to the end of his Division I career. He played one season at Iowa Western Community College in 2024 before signing with the Saints as an undrafted free agent, and he spent last season on the practice squad. Boutte was arrested in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, in January 2024 on charges of underage betting while at LSU. The arrest came roughly eight months after he had been drafted in Round 6 by the Patriots, and the charges were ultimately dropped. According to police, Boutte placed more than 8,900 wagers from April 2022 to May 2023, including betting on at least 17 college football games -- at least six of which involved LSU during that span. The NFL did not discipline Boutte.
×
×
  • Create New...