Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

LEBRON TO CLEVELAND! (OFFICIALLY CONFIRMED)


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

I love it.  As I've stated a million times, no player exceeds my fandom for my home teams.  My home teams come first no matter what...  If anyone or any team interferes with our success, then F THEM.  So, a part of me is really happy because it breaks up the Big 3, and even the years we sucked, I just had a hard time pulling for them to win it because of the circumstances surrounding that team...  And I was a fan of each of the big three as individual players, but them playing together, and then us, as a franchise, subsequently getting the poo beat out of us for the last four years because of their combined star power pissed me off.

 

I'm glad they're breaking up and going their separate ways.  It's good for our franchise, and as I've said elsewhere, if we can't win it all, I can definitely pull for LeBron to do it, WITH LESS STAR POWER AND GLAMOUR, in his homestate of Ohio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love it.  As I've stated a million times, no player exceeds my fandom for my home teams.  My home teams come first no matter what...  If anyone or any team interferes with our success, then F THEM.  So, a part of me is really happy because it breaks up the Big 3, and even the years we sucked, I just had a hard time pulling for them to win it because of the circumstances surrounding that team...  And I was a fan of each of the big three as individual players, but them playing together, and then us, as a franchise, subsequently getting the poo beat out of us for the last four years because of their combined star power pissed me off.

 

I'm glad they're breaking up and going their separate ways.  It's good for our franchise, and as I've said elsewhere, if we can't win it all, I can definitely pull for LeBron to do it, WITH LESS STAR POWER AND GLAMOUR, in his homestate of Cleveland.

 

Cleveland is not a state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonder what Wade does? Does he go back to Miami with a depleted team or go to the Bulls/who ever else lost out on the Melo/LeBron sweepstakes 

 

He'd cost too much and he's on the wrong side of his career but he'd be a good mentor for PJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cleveland is not a state.

Good catch Chaos.  I was in the middle of talking to someone at work as I typed that.  LOL.  College is paying off. 

 

I have a feeling your post calling me out will mysteriously disappear after a brief edit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think D-Wade to the Bulls is a great idea, gets him close to home as well.  Bosh being the native Texan would make for a homecoming trifecta if he chooses Houston.  Deplete the Heat and the fuging Southeast division can be OURS!!1!!!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sheridan is throwing up speculation as fact to get hits to his website and look like a genius if the story breaks that way.

 

If only LeBron scheduled a specific time and place where he would make his announcement. Maybe put it on television because alot of people are curious...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...