Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sporting News Report: Stephenson battle down to Hornets, Pacers, and Mavs


teeray

Recommended Posts

Lance would be 1st string SG, no doubt...

1st unit:

Kemba

Lance (fa)

MKG

Williams (fa)

Al

2nd unit:

Nelson (fa)

Hendo/Neal

Taylor/CDR (fa)

Zeller/Vonleh

Biz

Not sure if we can get both Lance and Nelson, but would def love it if happen.

Lance will be 1st string SG, but he would instantly be our best floor generator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess with us striking out on Hayward we could afford to overpay for Stephenson.

4yrs/$44mil ($11 per) for Stephenson

3 yrs/$16.5mil ($5.5 per) for Hinrich

 

Then s-n-a-t-c-h McRoberts back from the Heat with the rest of it.

 

Funny that the word ****** gets deleted without breaking the letters apart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to act quick. The Rockets are rumored to be taking up every hour of the 72 hours they are alotted to match the Parsons offer sheet (screwing with the Mavs).

Go ahead and give him a 4X10 and let's call it an offseason.

 

It's got to be higher then 10.   The Pacers can free up the space to go up to 11.3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the Pacers have to free up anything salary-wise, unless they're just trying to stay below the tax. They hold his bird rights and should be able to offer him as high as a max deal if they wanted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the Pacers have to free up anything salary-wise, unless they're just trying to stay below the tax. They hold his bird rights and should be able to offer him as high as a max deal if they wanted?

 

 Yes, managment has stated they want to stay below the lux tax.  If we offer high enough theat they match going over at least we get some money back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The problem that Bryce faces is his lack of prototypical tools.  He's not the tall, strong armed mobile QB that tends to get drafted first overall.  His game is not played in underwear on a practice field.  His best asset are his intangibles.  They aren't sexy like a cannon arm or a fast 40 yard dash. OK, so we took the lesser athlete.  Bryce put up a pretty bad season with a bad team around him.  The coaching staff, for all it's platitudes, sucked.  They made sure Bryce could run a huddle, but didn't help him get better as a player.  Bad choice. Compare that to what other teams did to their Rookies:  they put them in position to succeed with better personnel and better play calling.  Sure, there are physical differences which are going to affect the outcomes, but you can't change it. Am I trying to ride to the defense of Bryce?  Only a little.  He's my favorite team's QB, and I believe in him.  Now, he's got this year to show that he's "the No. 1 for a reason" (Thanks CJ Stroud).  Will he, won't he?  I don't know at all.  That's on the D&D crew to put Bryce is position to play well.  Running the ball is going to make things a lot easier for Bryce.  Does that discount his success if he plays well?  For some of y'all it will.  Some of y'all just don't like Bryce, like he stole you DoorDash or something. Regardless, let's see what happens in 2024.  If Bryce stinks it up, then we're going back to the QB well again.  
    • we may think we know, but we don't know. we won't know what effect upgrades on the OL, coaching staff, and WR room will have. we don't know what scheme canales is going to put together. we don't know a lot of things.  that's why we play the games...to see what shakes out. plenty of reasons to think Bryce is limited this year...again. Plenty of reasons to see an improvement in his play. 
    • He did not elevate the players around him, but they de-elevated their QB.  A QB like Bryce needs a system, a strong OL, a Running game, and WRs that can get open.  Call him a manager at best, but so is a point guard.  That is all we should need.  He is smart enough to grow into a very effective player.  I once saw a Coach talking about the OL--i forget who it was Schottenheimer comes to mind--and he said, you can succeed if you have one weak link on the OL.  If you get 2 weak links, success comes 10x harder.  If you get three weak links, your season is over.  Your QB is injured, and you are unemployed (paraphrasing).  I would say that we had 4 weak links (Icky does not get a pass) and a RB who was not good at pass blocking. I am not saying the Bryce is the answer at QB--but I am saying we don't know yet. I know QBs (college) and when the OL sucks, they collapse mentally over time.  That is what we saw--a QB who had never played without the advantage.
×
×
  • Create New...