Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornets sign Lance Stephenson to 3yr/27m contract.


Jakob

Recommended Posts

Jordan goes back to Indiana, bends them over again, and ships them Henderson for a 1st.

 

I wouldn't be surprised we screwed over the Heat so bad in the Shabazz/Hairston trade he called it "extortion"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now...

Walker/Roberts

Stephenson/Henderson/Hairston/Neal

Kidd-Gilchrist/Taylor

Williams/Zeller/Vonleh

Jefferson/Biyombo

If we dump Henderson & add Boozer...

Walker/Roberts

Stephenson/Hairston/Neal

Kidd-Gilchrist/Williams/Taylor

Boozer/Zeller/Vonleh

Jefferson/Biyombo

... regardless of our interest in Boozer, I think it's safe to say Henderson will never wear a Hornets uniform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WFNZ slurping all over Bonnell this morning, saying he "broke" the story that the Hornets were even "considering" Stephenson. They just had Bonnell on, and Bonnell proceeded to say there had been "absolutely no contact between the Hornets and Stephenson before the last 48 hours," which was Bonnell's way of saying, "SportingNews was wrong," and of course the Charlotte media is going to believe Bonnell.

 

So, who's right? It depends on who you want to believe.

 

Bonnell should've broken the signing story first, since he's in Vegas with the team and closer to the FO than everyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...