Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting point made on radio.


uncpanther

Recommended Posts

I had to listen to part of the game on the radio and they brought up the fact that the Patriots have merged practices with the Redskins and some other team that I can't think of right now but the point was that they may be more poilshed due to the fact they are practicing against another NFL team and not themselves.

Lafell also said after he was signed by the Patriots that there training camp was much more strenious than Rivera's.

I think that it would have a tremendous effect on the team if they had merged practices since it would replicate game speed more so than playing against your own team. Just a thought.....

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or. . .it's preseason.

 

To be fair, Zod did tell us, and has said many times, that our practices have been fairly loose and relaxed lately, and even attributed that to the slow starts we've had in the past.

 

Also, I've wondered why we don't practice with another NFL team. Seems odd that a lot of other teams are doing (hell, even the Falcons did it with the Titans randomly and with the Texans a few days before their preseason game).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had to listen to part of the game on the radio and they brought up the fact that the Patriots have merged practices with the Redskins and some other team that I can't think of right now

they did joint practices with/against the two teams they played this preseason before us. I like the idea and think we should look into it for the future. They were one of three teams to do joint practices twice this preseason (along with Falcons and Texans) and one of the 13 total NFL teams that did joint practices this preseason

here are articles arguing why such joint practices are a plus:

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/The-value-of-the-NFL-joint-practice-in-August.html

(NFP on why more teams should do it)

http://beta.sportingnews.com/article/4601644-nfl-joint-practices-vs-preseason-games-most-valuable-redskins-patriots-eagles-ravens-49ers

("Across the league, coaches and players for every team holding joint practices sing their praises")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
×
×
  • Create New...