Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Disappointed - Corrected


Davis83

Recommended Posts

I'm kinda getting tired of hearing those two words every press conference. 

 

"things need to be corrected", "its disappointing".

 

 

reminds me a lot of a much heard excuse in years past - "it is what it is".

 

Maybe try "player X is deactivated so we can activate player Y that will listen and show some effort"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe try "player X is deactivated so we can activate player Y that will listen and show some effort"

Sounds like a perfect recipe on how to lose a locker room.

You make sweeping moves on starters in private not by announcing it to the press on the day after a bad loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RR on tape: "honestly I don't know anything yet guys, I haven't met with the coaches yet so we can review the tapes"

RR on backups: "the young man has earned an opportunity to step up and make plays for us.... he really has"

RR on backup backups: "He's done some nice things for us in camp and preseason and he'll get a chance"

RR on defense solution: "We just have to execute, we have guys not where they need to be"

RR on injuries: "I'm not sure, honestly guys, I really don't know, I'll find out how the MRI goes as soon as I'm done with you all"

RR on another loss: "What's disappointing is I thought we had a couple good days of practice even though the rain came down on us"

RR on what went wrong: "Well it started with the beginning penalties, and we dug ourselves into a hole early and couldn't quite recover"

RR on not going for it on 4th and short and settling for a tie: "I thought it would be best to let Gano get us 3 and put it on the defense"

RR on PS re-signings rather than fresh faces: "Well we felt he knew the system from last year and he stayed in football shape"

RR on exit: "We're done? 

 

PYXCrDe.gif

 

thank you guys"......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what our D looks like right now.. Imagine for a moment a team literally lost every single defensive back and LB to injury, so as a result that team has no choice but to promote practice squad WRs to step in and play CB and practice squad TEs to play linebacker. THATS exactly what our D looked like on Sunday, beyond lost and beyond confused. Ive never seen anything like it.

Ive watched some bad defenses this year, Saints among others and I havent seen anything close to the ineptude of our D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...