Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hey Dave even Zack Mettenburger has better weapons then Cam. .


WOW!!

Recommended Posts

All I said was that your arguement was obliterated with facts (and it WAS)....that is not a personall attack. That is stating a fact.

Me calling you a fuging moron would be a personal attack....but I did not do that.

Not my problem if you can't deal with facts.

You know I'm talking about your actions on Sunday...

Which again you haven't been suspended for while others have.....

But don't worry I don't blame you... I know now that certain Mods have targets out on certain posters..

Certain Mods use their "power" around here like Ron Rivera uses his dog house. .lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Kali was drafted for Jake not Cam since he was here 4 years before Cam..

Also add to your Tampa list

Mike Williams

Doug Martin

Vince Jackson

Mike Evans

Austin Seferian

Luke Sticker

Smokey in Pittsburgh now (I can't Remember the RB'S name right now)

 

Mike Williams doesn't play for the Bucs anymore, dude.  They traded him to the Bills back in April. So now you're citing a guy that no longer even plays there (and was a headache when he did) as an example of good team building. 

 

Brilliant :lol:

 

Doug Martin is actually even more broken down than Jonathan Stewart,  And supposedly #1 receiver Vincent Jackson actually has fewer catches, yards and less than half as many TDs on the year as Greg Olsen. 

 

But hey, how does Vincent Jackson even count using your logic since he was acquired for the previous quarterback; as were Martin, Stocker and Williams(who, as already pointed out, is no longer even on the team).

 

And Luke Stocker?  You're seriously appealing to Luke Stocker?  Who's the next point in your argument?  Garrett Gilkey? :wacko:

 

Good grief, you're bad at this.  It's actually comical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Williams doesn't play for the Bucs anymore, dude. They traded him to the Bills back in April. So now you're citing a guy that no longer even plays there (and was a headache when he did) as an example of good team building.

Brilliant :lol:

Doug Martin is actually even more broken down than Jonathan Stewart, And supposedly #1 receiver Vincent Jackson actually has fewer catches, yards and less than half as many TDs on the year as Greg Olsen.

But hey, how does Vincent Jackson even count using your logic since he was acquired for the previous quarterback; as were Martin, Stocker and Williams(who, as already pointed out, is no longer even on the team).

And Luke Stocker? You're seriously appealing to Luke Stocker? Who's the next point in your argument? Garrett Gilkey? :wacko:

Good grief, you're bad at this. It's actually comical.

Wait you put Kali on your list and he was here 4 years before Cam? ?? I was using Mike Williams Vince Jackson and Stocker for Freeman.. You can add Doug Martin to that list.. I see you're changing the rules every post now..

Again you're missing the point of the effort and resources used to surround their QB with talent has been better then here.

What top FA wr did we add??

How many draft picks were used for WR and Olinemen since CAm has been here??

They traded for a pro bowl guard did we??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait you put Kali on your list and he was here 4 years before Cam? ?? I was using Mike Williams Vince Jackson and Stocker for Freeman.. You can add Doug Martin to that list.. I see you're changing the rules every post now..

Again you're missing the point of the effort and resources used to surround their QB with talent has been better then here.

What top FA wr did we add??

How many draft picks were used for WR and Olinemen since CAm has been here??

They traded for a pro bowl guard did we??

 

Good grief!  You're still trying to spin this? :lol:

 

This whole moronic thread started out because you wanted to take arbitrary players and use that method to show one team better than the other.  Heck, if you can just pick and choose who you compare, I could prove the Raiders are better than the Patriots (Oakland has a better third string tackle.  They must be a better team!  Records be damned!).

 

You made a stupid thread trying to say that a team worse than us actually has better weapons.  Then later on you took something i said in jest as an example of how dumb your comparison method actually was and ran with it.  Right now your success rate at debating is somewhere between Wile E Coyote and the DA that used to face off against Perry Mason.

 

But see, there are actually interesting things to discuss now, stuff way more relevant than this goofy crap.

 

You made a dumb thread based on a stupid premise and comparison method.  No amount of spin will save it.  You lose.

 

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to focus on threads that actually matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good grief! You're still trying to spin this? :lol:

This whole moronic thread started out because you wanted to take arbitrary players and use that method to show one team better than the other. Heck, if you can just pick and choose who you compare, I could prove the Raiders are better than the Patriots (Oakland has a better third string tackle. They must be a better team! Records be damned!).

You made a stupid thread trying to say that a team worse than us actually has better weapons. Then later on you took something i said in jest as an example of how dumb your comparison method actually was and ran with it. Right now your success rate at debating is somewhere between Wile E Coyote and the DA that used to face off against Perry Mason.

But see, there are actually interesting things to discuss now, stuff way more relevant than this goofy crap.

You made a dumb thread based on a stupid premise and comparison method. No amount of spin will save it. You lose.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to focus on threads that actually matter.

No the "moronic" thread was made to put the spotlight on another team (who drafted a QB the same year we did) and the resources they put in to surround him with talent.

And they did this without even knowing if the guy could play or stay healthy. .

Now compare their actions to ours and that was the point of this thread. ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ppl want to trade Melo? Am I wrong for thinking that would be a bad idea? 
    • Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
×
×
  • Create New...