Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

regardless of the outcome of this game, Rivera needs to be fired tomorrow.


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

Talk all week was how we control our own destiny, win and you're in.

We come out and give up TWO BLOCKED PUNTS IN THE FIRST HALF, BOTH RETURNED FOR TD. I have never witnessed such failure in my history as a football fan, from peewee football on up.

The status quo and mediocre efforts are not acceptable, and someone needs to make that clear tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said in the gameday thread, the entire FO should be evaluated for overseeing this debacle. Gettleman included.

 

we've see everything we need to see from rivera and his group of inepts.

 

i want to see what gettleman can come up with when given the chance to pick his own coaching staff from top to bottom.

 

but he needs to own that clusterf*ck he is responsible for on the OL.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

won't get an argument from me.

at least one person should be fired tomorrow....rodgers.

then shula the week after that if they don't win.

then mcdermott.

then rivera at the end of the season.

No doubt Rodgers should be, but Rivera needs to be. Enough is enough. It's his responsibility to oversee his staff and ensure that they, as well as the players, are prepared to win each and every game. Too often, and today is the most obvious example, he doesn't have us prepared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we've see everything we need to see from rivera and his group of inepts.

i want to see what gettleman can come up with when given the chance to pick his own coaching staff from top to bottom.

but he needs to own that clusterf*ck he is responsible for on the OL.

But the problem is that if Rivera and Co. weren't his guys, then why are we sitting at this point now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No doubt Rodgers should be, but Rivera needs to be. Enough is enough. It's his responsibility to oversee his staff and ensure that they, as well as the players, are prepared to win each and every game. Too often, and today is the most obvious example, he doesn't have us prepared.

who do we put in his place?

 

 

not that it matters.

 

totally agree on it being on rivera's shoulders for us not being prepared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the problem is that if Rivera and Co. weren't his guys, then why are we sitting at this point now?

 

he gave rivera & co a chance and it paid off last season. we just didn't realize how much of a fluke that season was going to be. couldn't fire rivera after last season. there was no reason because it seemed like rivera turned the corner when really it was just a blind squirrel finding a nut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right...I think they've done really well. No one's going to bat 1000% but they've addressed areas of need and there's no comparison to the overall talent of the team now than when DC and then Morgan got the reigns. This whole season is about seeing how much of a step up can Bryce and this team make. If Bryce can't and last year is as good as it gets for him then at least we have a talented roster for the next guy. I think we're going to be good this season 
    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
×
×
  • Create New...