Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

matt moore needs to start because jake is not that good


speedy233

Recommended Posts

matt moore needs to start because jake is not that good if u watch every game u will see that 75% of jake throws is bad throws but steve and moose bails him out by making spectacular catches but jake is a good leader and i have to give him that matt moore is a better quaterback because he is mobile and has a big arm and if u listen to espn repoters moore is underated he just need a mentor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Jake, who's preseason rating was 88.1 against four outstanding defenses and their first strings, is worse than Moore, who had a preseason rating of 58.5 against third strings.

I guess that was because Jake was bailed out continuously by Smitty and Moose, huh? Oh, wait...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Jake, who's preseason rating was 88.1 against four outstanding defenses and their first strings, is worse than Moore, who had a preseason rating of 58.5 against third strings.

I guess that was because Jake was bailed out continuously by Smitty and Moose, huh? Oh, wait...

But but teh cardinals game!!!11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

matt moore needs to start because jake is not that good if u watch every game u will see that 75% of jake throws is bad throws but steve and moose bails him out by making spectacular catches but jake is a good leader and i have to give him that matt moore is a better quaterback because he is mobile and has a big arm and if u listen to espn repoters moore is underated he just need a mentor

You should be banned for egregious lack of punctuation

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've shown you numerous comps for other tackles in the same age and talent range.  His contract, taking into account his age, health, etc.  is the going rate.  It's a fair deal. I've shown you examples of how long it usually takes to find even an average replacement.  Hell, look at every tackle that has ever started for the Panthers.  How many would you consider a success?  They are not easy to find. After everything we've done with this team since drafting Bryce why would we decide to let our best linemen go and add a huge question mark at tackle?   FA is a crapshoot in which any guy available will have cons/issues.  If not, they'll cost a fortune.   Outside of a first or maybe 2nd round pic next year it'll take a few years for a tackle to learn the position at the NFL level.  There are still questions about Icky. Every vet NFL player deals with maintenance.  Between the contract value and history I'm not overly worried about his knee.  I contend his knee issue isn't anything to be overly worried about.  It's not zero risk but it's an acceptable risk.  Every player we draft and every contract we sign has risk.  You're blowing up his own negative words about his knees and ignoring him saying he is healthy and the knee is a non issue.  You have a strong chicken little complex with this team.  Being he has always been a Panther they are very aware of any health issues. We paid now because now is cheaper.  If his knee was really an issue they would have waited.  That tells me it's not the issue you want it to be.    
    • Sauls getting cut by Steelers if no trade happens.
    • No they are going to give Claudin Cherelus 2 spots. 
×
×
  • Create New...