Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Graham Gano led NFL field goals during preseason (and some other stats re: TDs and total scoring)


KB_fan

Recommended Posts

Ok, digging yet a bit further into our scoring & offense stats.

 

We're 6th in passing in the preseason, with 927 passing yards:

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=2&offensiveStatisticCategory=TEAM_PASSING&conference=ALL&role=TM&season=2015&seasonType=PRE

(we were 19th in the regular season in 2014)

 

From the same table, sorting by different columns, I note:

  • We're tied for 4th best in lowest number of QB sacks against us (5 total).  No team had fewer than 4 sacks against them.   (For reference we were 20th last year with 42 sacks against us in the reg. season last year).
  • We're tied for 2nd in terms of lowest interceptions thrown, with only 1 interception against us in the preseason.
  • We're 13th in 1st down % during the preseason

 

As far as preseason RUSHING.stats go, you'll find them here:

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=false&conference=null&role=TM&offensiveStatisticCategory=RUSHING&defensiveStatisticCategory=null&season=2015&seasonType=PRE&tabSeq=2&qualified=false&Submit=Go

 

Some interesting notes re: Rushing:

  • We're 9th with 502 total yards and in terms of average rushing yards / game:  with 125.5 rushing yards per game.  (Last year in the regular season, we were 7th in total rushing yards and  in yards per game at 127 avg yards per game.)

 

  • We're 5th in terms of yards per rushing attempt at 4.3 yards per attempt.  (Our 2014 regular season average was also 4.3 yards per attempt, which placed us 13th during the 2014 season)

 

  • We're 2nd in 1st down % at 24.8%
  • 0 fumbles on rushing plays
  • 3 rushes for 20+ yards

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to the original thread topic of Graham Gano:

In 2014 regular season he was tied for 8th in the league in terms of FG made, making 29 of 35 attempts. His FG% was 83% (22nd place).  (35 attempts put us tied for 7th in terms of most attempts).

In 2013 regular season, he was tied for 20th in the league in terms of FG made, making 24 of 27 attempts.  His FG % was 89% (15th place).  We were 24th in number of FG attempts.

 

FGs in the 2015 preseason are substantially different than 2014 preseason

2015 preseason  10 FGs made in 10 attempts = 100%  (1st in FGM, 2nd in attempts)

2014 preseason:  1 FG made of 2 attempts = 50%  (tied for 37th in FGM, 31st in FG attempts)

2013 preseason: 8 FG made of 8 attempts = 100% (tied for 6th in FGM, 7th in FG attempts)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been debating whether to start a separate topic for defensive preseason stats, but I'm not sure there's anything all that notable.  Here are a few things I found.

 

16th in total points allowed (77 points) (19.2 points per game)

15th in total tackles

Tied for 14th with 10 sacks

Tied for 3rd with 5 interceptions

Tied for 15th in forced fumbles with 2 FF

13th in yards per game allowed (299.8 yards per game allowed)  [Atlanta was 23rd, Tampa 24th, New Orleans 28th]

6th in terms of turnovers with a +5 turnover level

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday may not have been the best time for this thread in the excitement of all the cuts.  Just curious though, what stats do Huddlers put the most weight on.
 

What stats best capture the strength or weakness of our team?  I ask so that I can keep it in mind for any future statistical analyses threads I post.  I want to make sure I focus on what most Huddlers deem important.  Thanks in advance for any input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When one in four games is won by a field goal, it's good to have a guy like Gano on the roster. I think he's going to be a reliable weapon for us. The field goals are good, but those booming kick-offs really help our team out, too. Our defense is a hard one to march 80 yards on, and we don't have to worry about kick off coverage as much when he boots it out of the end zone on most attempts.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy to hear Gano is playing well.

But our red zone TD percentage is the real concern.

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/red-zone-scoring-pct/

In 2014 we were ranked 26th out of 32.

In 2013 we were ranked 19th out of 32.

In 2012 we were ranked 9th out of 32.

In 2011 we were ranked 7th out of 32.

Notice how it has been declining rapidly since Shula took over.

We've all seen it countless times, our offense will march down the field with ease, then we'll run a few mind numbing plays in the red zone, and have to kick a field goal. It seems like a blind man could see some of these play calls coming from a mile away. If we continue to struggle in the red zone this year, we need a new OC, period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy to hear Gano is playing well.

But our red zone TD percentage is the real concern.

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/red-zone-scoring-pct/

In 2014 we were ranked 26th out of 32.

In 2013 we were ranked 19th out of 32.

In 2012 we were ranked 9th out of 32.

In 2011 we were ranked 7th out of 32.

Notice how it has been declining rapidly since Shula took over.

Interesting stats TheRed, thanks.

I agree, it looks pretty damning against Shula. 

Let's hope we can turn it around this season.

Preseason was not encouraging.  I just realized I have red zone efficiency stats for the Panthers and our preseason opponents in the gamebooks I downloaded.

Bills game:             Panthers  2 - 2 = 100%  /  Bills  2 - 3 = 67%

Dolphins game      Panthers 3 - 4 = 75%   /  Dolphins  3 - 4 = 75%

Patriots game:      Panthers 1 - 4 = 25%   / Patriots  2 - 2 = 100%

Steelers game:     Panthers 0 - 3 = 0%    / Steelers 0 - 3 = 0%

TOTAL:                Panthers  6 / 13  = 46%   Opponents:  7 / 12 = 58%

I attribute some of the declining efficiency during the preseason to:

1) Kelvin's absence

2) Fear of injury = Cam's not running..., etc.  I think once we started to lose key vets like Kelvin, Kalil, Star, it perhaps dialed back any sense of go for it mentality.  After all Kalil was injured on one of those goal line TD attempts...

I *hope* with Cam healthy this season it will help our red zone %, but obviously, until we find a receiver who can step up for some of what Kelvin does, his loss is a huge blow.

                             

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Gano makes 2.5 FGs per game this season, he'll make 40 FGs and that'll put him tied for #2 on the list for most FGs in an NFL season.  Given that we run a slow paced offense, that would mean that we likely were terrible in the redzone.  I hope that isn't the case.

We had one season, 1996, where our kicker led the league in field goals. John Kasay set the NFL record for successful field goals, making 37 out of 40. We went 12-4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're correct (on its face). But PFF does indeed use advanced stats to come up with their grades. Not trying to turn this into a debate about PFF (at all because it's been done ad nauseum), but here is how PFF explains it:   GRADES VS. STATS We aren’t grading players based on the yardage they rack up or the stats they collect. Statistics can be indicative of performance but don’t tell the whole story and can often lie badly. Quarterbacks can throw the ball straight to defenders but if the ball is dropped, you won't see it on the stat sheet. Conversely, they can dump the ball off on a sequence of screen passes and end up with a gaudy looking stat line if those skill position players do enough work after the catch. PFF grades the play, not its result, so the quarterback that throws the ball to defenders will be downgraded whether the defender catches the ball to notch the interception on the stat sheet or not. No amount of broken tackles and yards after the catch from a bubble screen will earn a quarterback a better grade, even though his passing stats may be getting padded. The same is true for most positions. Statistics can be misleading. A tackle whose quarterback gets the ball out of his hands quicker than anybody else may not give up many sacks, but he can still be beaten often and earn a poor grade. Receivers that are targeted relentlessly could post big-time numbers but may offer little more than the product of a volume-based aerial attack. https://www.pff.com/grades So PFF uses stats to come up with player grades and rankings.  
    • Not even what that's about. Moreover, remember that search engines are a tool.
    • Knowing how a person is compared to everyone else is always better. 
×
×
  • Create New...