Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Norman's Trash Talking


t96

Trash talking good or bad?  

118 members have voted

  1. 1. Trash talking good or bad?



Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Montsta said:

Honestly IMO he was so far from that play he would have literally no impact after the pick, unless he immediately started downfield with Coleman. 

But your point is valid.  

Dez easily could have been down there and attempted a tackle around the 10 yard line. 

 

Also, funny we are talking about the same thing we were talking about a year later.

http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/10642/normans-taunting-penalty-didnt-help-carolinas-cause

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted good...if he can take players out of the game just by talking that's a good plus.

We're just missing Smitty to do it to the other team's defenders....damn what a combo that'd be....oh well Cam seems to get under the skin of the defense just in a different way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Correct this logic I might if it meant taking his guaranteed money now and spread it over 3 years (2026-2028) and maybe add $6m.  I am not sure you can do that, or that he would do it, but it would be a way for him to extend his career and bank accounts and we would be getting him for $6m for 2 years (if healthy), basically, since his entire salary is guaranteed now.  If not, we lose an additional $6m spread over 2 years.  So let's say his guaranteed $$ for 2026 is $18m.  Give him a $24m contract ($8m per) through 2028.  Worst case:  We get $10m in cap relief now and create $3m dead cap for 2 years (2027-8).   Best case?  We get cap relief now and a good/decent guard/tackle for 2 years (2027-2028) and the total salary per year when he is active would be $12m if you don't count any money for the season he cannot play.  That is a good value, and we'd basically be getting a 50% discount rate.  Since we have so much guaranteed now, extending him is not as crazy as it seems.   Something has to be wrong with this logic...      
    • I don't disagree about Nikishin's potential availability, but Hamilton as a replacement? Not an upgrade in my book.
×
×
  • Create New...