Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CaMVP- Deion, Marshal and another guy

TheWiz

By TheWiz,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TheWiz Proficient

TheWiz

Posted
Posted

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-gameday/0ap3000000596245/Should-Cam-Newton-be-the-top-candidate-for-MVP

enjoy. 

Marshal Faulk: People keep saying its Cam's Defense, thats why or they keep giving him opportunities. No, he went toe to toe, score for score with Drew today and he matched him. 

Deion S: Is Cam Newton the #1 candidate for the MVP right now? 

Marshal Faulk: without a doubt:

D.S: I just wanted to hear you say it. 

M.F: Listen. He showed that today and Im not talking about with his legs or with his arms, but with his mind. He moved safeties, he put guys in play. 

D.S: The only thing he did wrong with his mind today was to keep throwing to Ted Ginn. 

M.F: Do you realize how hard it is to go back and throw the ball to a guy who dropped a touchdown. (Deion: or two) You know how much confidence it takes to believe in that guy?

 

They go on to talk about his leadership and how he plays the game.... 

Deion's been a Cam fan since day one but these others are tardy to the party... 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...