Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bands/Artists


17+89=6

Recommended Posts

Avenged Sevenfold kicks some serious ass live. That is all.

I've seen them live 5 times. From the Waking the Fallen days to now. My favorite shows of theirs were during the City of Evil days. I saw them in Myrtle Beach at the tail end of their Cities of Evil tour. It was amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen them live 5 times. From the Waking the Fallen days to now. My favorite shows of theirs were during the City of Evil days. I saw them in Myrtle Beach at the tail end of their Cities of Evil tour. It was amazing.

was there. Only saw them one other time at Amos' for their self-titled album. I literally played their music for 2 str8 years at one point on a day to day basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

was there. Only saw them one other time at Amos' for their self-titled album. I literally played their music for 2 str8 years at one point on a day to day basis.

Dude I was at Amos' when they were touring Self Titled. I had seen them in Myrtle Beach the week prior as well. I still play City of Evil every day of my life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A7X is meh... Kind of too commercial and mall-rattish to me...

BTBAM is the best out there... The Faceless are another one of my favorites, and I am also currently still listening to IWrestledABearOnce and Arsonists Get All the Girls...

As for other genres, nothing good has come out of them in years, so I don't bother... I'll still pop in some Biggie/Tupac every now and then for some rap, or maybe even Little Brother... But I usually stick to metal/classic rock... I also enjoy some bluegrass every now and then, but don't really have any favorites...

I'm gonna try to get to Amos' in Charlotte on the 6th of October though.. BTBAM + The Faceless + 3 Inches of Blood + In Flames.. Should be a sick show...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...