Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

#2 Seed if we lose to Giants and beat Saints?


pantherbiker

Recommended Posts

Are we guaranteed the #2 seed if we lose to the Giants and beat the Saints? Don't we get a first round bye with the #2 seed and a playoff game at home? If so then this may still not be that bad, because if the Giants get homefield, and happen to lose in the playoffs, then we could get homefield since they'd be eliminated. Either way we'll be setting pretty if I am correct.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is true but i would rather have homefield advantage you know since we are 8-0 at home this year, that is always better then going to meadowlands for nfc championship game...Plus #1 seed gets the weaker of the wild card teams which may help us also but may not be good because it could either be falcons or cowboys...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking that in a REAL CRAZY sense - At least if we did lose to the Giants we'd have much more revenge motivation for beating them in the playoffs when it mattered the most. (But rather play them at our house). I am real afraid of facing the Giants twice. Beating them twice would seem nearly impossible. Hopefully we will beat them the first time and won't have to play them again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If any of the three (Dal, Atl, Tam) lose any of their next two we're in automatically.

If both ATL and Tampa lose at least one game, we win the division regardless of what we do.

If we lose to NY but beat New Orleans we win the division, secure the # 2 seed and home field advantage against everyone but NY regardless of what the other guys do.

If we beat the Giants we win the division, secure the # 1 seed and home field advantage throughout regardless of what the other guys do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather us beat the giants and lock in the home field. That way we would at least be playing the giants at our house if we were to meet again. I think our fans are much better this year than they have been in the past. The tampa bay game was the most enjoyable game I've been to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If any of the three (Dal, Atl, Tam) lose any of their next two we're in automatically.

If both ATL and Tampa lose at least one game, we win the division regardless of what we do.

If we lose to NY but beat New Orleans we win the division, secure the # 2 seed and home field advantage against everyone but NY regardless of what the other guys do.

If we beat the Giants we win the division, secure the # 1 seed and home field advantage throughout regardless of what the other guys do.

Also, we are the number two seed if Atlanta, Tampa, and Minnesota lose one game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we guaranteed the #2 seed if we lose to the Giants and beat the Saints? Don't we get a first round bye with the #2 seed and a playoff game at home? If so then this may still not be that bad, because if the Giants get homefield, and happen to lose in the playoffs, then we could get homefield since they'd be eliminated. Either way we'll be setting pretty if I am correct.:D

Yeah, I'm pretty sure you are correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh please with the wallowing in victimhood I'm going to take my ball and go home routine. You were just in here referring to people as super weird haters because they don't completely agree with your borderline delusional spin on what Bryce Young is and isn't as a fourth year starter. We can hope by some miracle that Bryce Young will actually be able to lead a formidable passing offense this season without being irrational homers and pretending verfiable data and what we have seen with our own two eyes doesn't tell us exactly what he has been to this point which is someone who moves the ball at a historically low rate.
    • I am curious who's behind all of this though. A video and photos from years ago surfacing? Someone has a vendetta and is driving this PR campaign. I'm loving it, but I'd also like to know who said mystery figure is. 
    • I say positive things about Bryce when he earns them. Which he has a handful of times. It is all here and on the record but your lobby won’t focus on that or the flat out truth inside of our critical comments.  It is a constant thing with him and his backers - one or two good things and people are trying to extrapolate that to proof we should commit to him, while ignoring or making excuses for the larger portion of his track record.  When he is able to consistently turn in franchise QB extension worthy outings the tone of the posts will reflect that.  I have already said that if he would play like he did in the WC as often as we need him to, I would be okay with keeping him.  See you don’t want to talk about that though because it shows actual fair minded evaluation not stanning.   
×
×
  • Create New...