Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

'Death Wish' reboot, starring...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Bruce Willis

Quote

Bruce Willis is 60 years old, just slightly older than Bronson’s 53 when he made the 1974 film. As Willis has shown in recent “Red” and “Die Hard” movies, he’s still got plenty of action hero left in him — and now he’ll be trying on the trench coat and revolver of wronged vigilante Paul Kersey.

The series, about an architect whose wife and daughter are violently raped and murdered by men who the court system fails to prosecute, centered on Bronson’s Kersey taking justice into his own hands. As the films went along (with progressively less effective results), the “Death Wish” franchise became a precursor for many of the ’80’s one-man-gang movies that made superstars out of names like Stallone, Schwarzenegger and of course, Bruce Willis — who now appears ready to come full circle with hopes of bringing back the franchise.

Hey, here's a fresh new storyline: "Scumbags hurt tough guy's loved ones. Tough guy gets revenge."

I liked the original Death Wish and its first sequel (the rest were crap) and what guy doesn't like Bruce Willis, but even so I'm not so sure about this idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...