Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

TV USS Enterprise just got the Smithsonian Treatment


cookinwithgas

Recommended Posts

On 6/29/2016 at 1:08 AM, Mr. Scot said:

The current movie series should get the mothball treatment.

The newest Star Trek movies are really good Star Wars movies.... if that makes sense.   They aren't bad, in fact, pretty good, just not really Star Trek.  But I don't think a Star Trek movie would sell well.

TV is what is needed for Trek to really be Trek but I'm not sure I trust network TV to be handling the new one :(. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, cookinwithgas said:

Its going to be 13 episodes with a single story line. Producer worked on DS9 and VOY among other things. I've given up hope for anything really good Trekwise since TNG ended, so it's not that big of a deal for me whether it works or not.

Just now hearing about a new show. Last night on George Norry, talk about ST and the new show. Going to be on CBS premium (whatever the name of it is) . So rating won't drive it, but subscriptions. Bryan Fuller the writer behind Hannibal and lots of ST will be running this, and after what NBC did to Hannibal can't blame him for taking it to pay tv.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no not really, the time for us old school Trekkers is long gone. We glommed onto the Roddenberry 1970s fan manipulation that got us our original cast movies and TNG, after that it was just Paramount squeezing it dry. It would be great to see ST: Beyond and this new show get back to the things we want - ethics, moral dilemmas that make us think, and great writing - but I'm never surprised when they don't happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, cookinwithgas said:

no not really, the time for us old school Trekkers is long gone. We glommed onto the Roddenberry 1970s fan manipulation that got us our original cast movies and TNG, after that it was just Paramount squeezing it dry. It would be great to see ST: Beyond and this new show get back to the things we want - ethics, moral dilemmas that make us think, and great writing - but I'm never surprised when they don't happen.

Agreed this was the best part of the original series. But the TNG sucked. Piccard is a pussy, and #1...bleh.

Wrath of Kahn was great, that's the peak for the return me thinks. I do like the revisit going on now though. I can use a little action, can't wait for this one the 22nd.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...