Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

TV USS Enterprise just got the Smithsonian Treatment


cookinwithgas

Recommended Posts

On 6/29/2016 at 1:08 AM, Mr. Scot said:

The current movie series should get the mothball treatment.

The newest Star Trek movies are really good Star Wars movies.... if that makes sense.   They aren't bad, in fact, pretty good, just not really Star Trek.  But I don't think a Star Trek movie would sell well.

TV is what is needed for Trek to really be Trek but I'm not sure I trust network TV to be handling the new one :(. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, cookinwithgas said:

Its going to be 13 episodes with a single story line. Producer worked on DS9 and VOY among other things. I've given up hope for anything really good Trekwise since TNG ended, so it's not that big of a deal for me whether it works or not.

Just now hearing about a new show. Last night on George Norry, talk about ST and the new show. Going to be on CBS premium (whatever the name of it is) . So rating won't drive it, but subscriptions. Bryan Fuller the writer behind Hannibal and lots of ST will be running this, and after what NBC did to Hannibal can't blame him for taking it to pay tv.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no not really, the time for us old school Trekkers is long gone. We glommed onto the Roddenberry 1970s fan manipulation that got us our original cast movies and TNG, after that it was just Paramount squeezing it dry. It would be great to see ST: Beyond and this new show get back to the things we want - ethics, moral dilemmas that make us think, and great writing - but I'm never surprised when they don't happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, cookinwithgas said:

no not really, the time for us old school Trekkers is long gone. We glommed onto the Roddenberry 1970s fan manipulation that got us our original cast movies and TNG, after that it was just Paramount squeezing it dry. It would be great to see ST: Beyond and this new show get back to the things we want - ethics, moral dilemmas that make us think, and great writing - but I'm never surprised when they don't happen.

Agreed this was the best part of the original series. But the TNG sucked. Piccard is a pussy, and #1...bleh.

Wrath of Kahn was great, that's the peak for the return me thinks. I do like the revisit going on now though. I can use a little action, can't wait for this one the 22nd.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Umm yeah. When did he get it done at the right time? I seem to remember a 4-6 finish and needing Atlanta to win our way into the playoffs but whatever.   
    • I mean....no lies detected. See above. We have traded a fortune to draft a guy #1 overall that people have lowered standards for to the point that not playing like Jimmy Clausen and looking like a poor man's Kyle Allen occasionally is worthy of a contract extension making him one of the highest paid QB's in the league. That is cope on steroids.
    • summary: "let's talk about your draft, what did you think about Freeling" Dan:   guys with a huge upside, can come in and compete to start.  High ceiling "he does what for your offense?" Dan:   it's hard to find left tackles, guys that big and athletic.  We have Icky coming off an injury, we signed Walker, I believe your offensive line can never be too strong.  If we're going to win the game, it's gotta be up front on both sides of the ball, so we make a point of emphasis on making both sides of the front as strong as possible. "how many mocks did you see Monro falling to you." Not many times, left tackles are gonna go a lot earlier than when we took him.  We want to add the best player, in free agency or the draft"  that's our philosophy, to get the best players possible. "Hunter and Brazzell." Dan:  we followed the board.  Lee we felt very highly of him , super strong.  Brazzel so flexible and loose, can open the verticle.  Will Lee we held in high regard. "you take a look at your receiver room, Coker, my goodness, your offensive rookie of the year in Tet.  Lost Rico, but there is Jonathan Brooks. " Brooks coming off two knee injuries, he worked his way back, looking great, fully healthy, will help in pass and run game.  Icky, not sure when he's coming back but we're excited about both "plan on extending Bryce" we'll keep talking, will keep internally.  We believe in him, has such a great grasp of Canales and offense, has improved every year. "he's clearly come back from the benching, the arrow is trending up, where does he feel" Bryce knows where we stand with him, when and if a deal gets done, he knows we feel great with him, we'll get something done at the right time. "if this a prove it situation?" everyone in the building has to prove it, has to earn it. Tmac was everything we wanted, his work ethic, he's so big and talented, but he puts the work in, and is a great teammate. "your level of expectation, the building's level of expectation for 2026 "our goal is to win the division every year, we know we have to earn it.  we have to put the work in every day, proving it on the practice field, and our  guys know that." "schedule" we haven't opened at home in 2 or 3 years.  We love prime time games, hope we get some "  
×
×
  • Create New...