Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lin signs with Nets


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Not with Lee walking?  I thought that would open up space for him.

I think the space was opened for Marvin. Seemed like Lin was going to be the one that was out. But I'm far from a cap expert. 

Damn....I started out a Lin hater and then was completely overcome with Linsanity by the end of the year and definitely the playoffs. Good luck to him. Hope it works out. I think the back up to Kemba role was one that suited him well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy knows the NBA can be pretty cruel. Trying to get as much as he can while he can. Don't blame him one bit. But I have a bad feeling he is going to regret this much sooner rather than later. Best of luck to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah @RoaringRiot, all I've been reading has said that we prioritized Batum and Marvin.  Those are the two guys our FO really wanted back...  Again, with Marvin's age and the numbers that have been out there, I really don't agree with that approach, but we'll see what happens.  I would've preferred Lin over Marvin.

And @nctarheel0619, the only other PG I've heard we are interested in is Tyler Johnson, which I still would prefer Lin over unless TJ comes significantly cheaper.

On the flipside, although I know it's the business, I feel kind of shafted by Lin because I feel like our team and situation allowed him to flourish, so I would expect some added loyalty for putting him in this position.  But, I don't think we were ever in the running.  I think the NY marketing opportunities may legitimately be his reason for signing there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Jeremy knows the NBA can be pretty cruel. Trying to get as much as he can while he can. Don't blame him one bit. But I have a bad feeling he is going to regret this much sooner rather than later. Best of luck to him.

Agreed. Even after his "money isn't everything" statement, ultimately it's a huge factor obviously. Regret it? I think so, but maybe that's a bit strong. He's definitely not going to find that flow and chemistry he had here. As much as I liked him I wouldn't want him as my starting PG. Can't imagine the NY fans feel differently. But Brooklyn is a mess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also just realized, the Nets just waived Jarrett Jack last night prior to signing Lin.  We were reportedly interested in Jack a couple years ago, so I would keep him in mind going forward as well.  He's a little older, but is similar to Lin in some facets, and likely he will come fairly cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...