Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jake Delhomme is not a "BIG-TIME" Quarterback, he is a...


HGG

Recommended Posts

..."BIG-GAME" Quarterback.

That is exactly why he will have a great game this Sunday.

Say what you will about Jake, but he always plays his best in games that are hyped to be very important, especially if his team is "EXPECTED" to lose it, like the Panthers are on Sunday.

We will see a very confident Jake Delhomme this Sunday, ala the 2005 playoff game against the Chicago Bears, a game most were picking us to LOSE. Against Seattle in the NFC Championship that same year, most were picking us to face the Steelers in the Super Bowl, and we might as well have not even shown up.

Most expect the Giants to win this, which will bring out the best in Delhomme.

I expect near 300 yards from him this Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He comes to play in December. I expect to have some success in the running game on Sunday night which will set him up nicely to get the open reads. #89 will be clutch, but I look to see Jake going to Moose across the middle much like he did against Denver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eric Caselias (however you spell it) was filling in for Colin Cowherd on Friday, and of course he picked the Giants because Jake Delhomme needs to show him something, because "Giants Stadium is a tough place to play in this late in the season if you've never done it before, and he's not sure if Delhomme can go up there and lead his team to victory (paraphrasing)."

Maybe he doesn't remember 2005, when Jake did that in the Panthers' 23-0 playoff victory that year.

Then they went to an even tougher place, THE CHICAGO BEARS, and did the same. It's not like that place was "easier" to play in than the Giants.

I repeat. These are the types of circumstances that usually bring out the best in Jake Delhomme, and I'll be surprised if he doesn't play well this weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...