Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

One Guy not playing


PntherPryd

How should commish handle inactive player?  

14 members have voted

  1. 1. How should commish handle inactive player?

    • do nothing
    • submit lineup based on league "coach" feature one time only
      0
    • submit lineup based on coach every week
      0


Recommended Posts

It's complicated by the fact that he has LT who is out this week, so if the vote goes toward setting lineup for him for one week only LT would be on bench rest of season.

Two guys already have blowout wins so I'm leaning toward doing nothing. The guy did pay so maybe he'll show up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You pay to play, you pay to lose. It's up to you to submit your lineup and do the work to make sure you have the best chance to win.

If this continues to be his operation - I might see this stacking up the playoffs for that conference a bit based on point differentials and possibly creating some matchup problems then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or conference rather.

Four guys from each conference get into playoffs (Minter, Topcats, etc.) This makes a total of 16 teams out of 48 that advance to postseason play and they are re-seeded based on record.

Of the four, three are automatic and they are the division winners. The four guys in each division play each other twice, btw.

The fourth conference playoff team is the wildcard team chosen via best record with a long list of tie-breakers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...