Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tyus Jones?


AppHeel

Recommended Posts

Note: This is not a rumor or anything and I have no inside info so idk who Cho is or isn't targeting.

It's unlikely that Charlotte will trade one of their "core" pieces regardless of whether you think they should or not. What could very well happen is that Cho will make another non sexy, under the radar trade like he did with Mo Williams, Courtney Lee, Miles Plumlee, etc) to try and help the team in the short term.

Any under the radar trade would involve a combination of Lamb, Sessions and Roberts going out to compensate what comes in.

I'm not a Duke fan or anything so no bias here, but what about making a play for Tyus Jones? The more I think about it, the more it makes sense to me. 

Why?

He's cheap with a couple years of cheap control

He plays well with pick and roll

He can create shots for others decently well

He can shoot from 3

He's also buried behind several PG's in MIN and Dunn is their future at that position so I'd bet he'd be available. Plus he isn't playing a ton of minutes so I doubt he'd cost that much. Might could get away with Roberts and a 2nd Round pick for him. 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If all it cost was Roberts or Sessions expiring and a second then sure why not. He can't be worse than what we have now. If they wanted Lamb then we'd have to get something else with Tyus to make that deal.

Or I could see us trying to send them Lamb and Sessions plus a second for Rubio. He wouldn't help our second unit in terms of scoring from the PG position but he is a good passer so he should help in that regards. Also with his size you'd like to think he could play with Kemba(and guard 2s) in situations where we want to go smaller.

Sent from my XT1254 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take a flyer on Quinn Cook in the d-league. Dude is putting up 30 and 40 point games right now. He is a distributer first but a lethal playmaker. Very good 3 point percentage and has really become creative as a driver and distributer. His defense sucks tho.. but yeah. Check his recent numbers and highlights

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...