Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Peppers Debate is Over.


ClawOn

Recommended Posts

I've gone back and forth with several of you regarding Peppers. It is not a discussion anymore. Season on the line and he's again a no-show. Meeks paraphrase: "The defense revolves around Peppers. He has to be dominant for us to have a chance." I saw one tackle. That cost us $1,000,000. If he had two, I apologize. He was rarely double teamed. Witten, who happens to be a tight end, handled him easily.

He's one player and not singly responsible for the loss. But he did nothing to help us win either. The crippling allocation of salary cap dollars to a player that doesn't even want to be on our team will forever baffle me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted a trade this offseason and even thought they should have traded Pep the last two offseasons, but thought he might have a good season playing for a contract since no trade could be mades. That all being said the two hand touch attempt on Jones when he ran by Pep really PISSED ME OFF and they should sit his ass and take away his C because that was pathetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, but those guys aren't depth guard signings, they're likely going to wait and see who has injuries or players under performing and then sign there. I also think that if Ickey really is going to be able to play at some point this year, that's where our guard depth comes from.  As if he gets to the point of being active, we'd then have 3 LT's on the roster with him, Freeling, and Walker, gotta think one of them not named Freeling gets kicked inside if needed.
    • lol imagine being Hill and this is what your coach thinks about you replacing a guy giving up over 4 goals per game.
    • I don't think Tyreek is a bad player to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
×
×
  • Create New...