Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Smitty takes blame for the pick6...


j2sgam

Recommended Posts

...from CarolinaGrowl via PFT

"Jake was expecting me to cross his face," Smith said, per Steve Reed of CarolinaGrowl.com. "I should have crossed his face and I didn't cross his face. I put Jake in a bad situation. I second-guessed my route and I shouldn't have. The bottom line is that I screwed Jake."

link...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...from CarolinaGrowl via PFT

link...

Holy crap, he even used my words...he really did screw Jake. Of course, it was so obvious that he had no choice but to admit it though.

I say again, the vast majority of Jake's INT's have come when he targets Steve Smith. Somebody needs to step up and take the pressure off of those two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i seen that in the observer......i think it was a option route bc if it wasnt newman knew the play the entire time....... he played inside,jumped inside.slash said this mouring that jake should have went to the other side of the field.

There is no way in hell that was an option route, because Jake threw that ball about 2 seconds after the snap. He fully expected Smith to be inside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way in hell that was an option route, because Jake threw that ball about 2 seconds after the snap. He fully expected Smith to be inside.

which proves the point that slash made.....why throw it to a triple covered guy.plus if a croner plays to the inside why would you even think about throwing a slant with the corner right there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

which proves the point that slash made.....why throw it to a triple covered guy.plus if a croner plays to the inside why would you even think about throwing a slant with the corner right there.

:rolleyes:IF Smitty had run the slant like he was supposed to, he would have been inside the corner. And I don't know where the hell you're getting triple coverage from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the lb rolled over to smith, and newman had saftey help.it was no way in hell he was going to catch that ball.look at newmans interview he said i was playing the inside, and got lucky.he wasnt expecting jake to actually throw it to inside.so thats were its coming from,i dont talk out my ass like some other posters son.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the lb rolled over to smith, and newman had saftey help.it was no way in hell he was going to catch that ball.look at newmans interview he said i was playing the inside, and got lucky.he wasnt expecting jake to actually throw it to inside.so thats were its coming from,i dont talk out my ass like some other posters son.

There was no LBer in on that play. It was a quick slant, hence the ball was thrown quickly, but Smitty ran the wrong route...everybody saw that but you, apparently.

And what the hell is it with you kids trying to put me down by calling me son? Don't' you know how ridiculous that is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was no LBer in on that play. It was a quick slant, hence the ball was thrown quickly, but Smitty ran the wrong route...everybody saw that but you, apparently.

And what the hell is it with you kids trying to put me down by calling me son? Don't' you know how ridiculous that is?

it was a lb in on that play go look at the tape brooking was there. i just seen it on espn from the sky view and dallas coverage was to were ever smitty went. yes i know smith ran the wrong route but when you have a corner playing inside and a lb there why the fug are you going to still try to put it in there.smitty and delhomme are not on the same page.......and im not a muthfuging kid,i wasn't putting you down.so get ya mind right!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it was a lb in on that play go look at the tape brooking was there. i just seen it on espn from the sky view and dallas coverage was to were ever smitty went. yes i know smith ran the wrong route but when you have a corner playing inside and a lb there why the f*ck are you going to still try to put it in there.smitty and delhomme are not on the same page.......and im not a muthf*cking kid,i wasn't putting you down.so get ya mind right!!!!!!!!

I just saw it too...the LBer was coming that way, but when the ball got there, he wasn't a factor at all. And if you just saw it, then you heard from the 3rd or 4th different former NFL coach and/or QB say that it was a quick slant that Smitty screwed up. It's not complicated.

BTW the part I just bolded is classic. Using childish language to proclaim your manhood. That's beautiful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...