Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Remakes, remakes...everywhere

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Updated: How about these ideas?

A reboot of "Predator". No Arnold. Instead we get Adrien Brody and Topher Grace? :sosp:

A new National Lampoon "Vacation" concentrating on son Rusty, now grown up and with a family of his own.

A new "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" with no relation to the original or the TV version.

A remake of "The Crow".

And, believe it or not, an attempt to redo "The Ten Commandments" in the vein of "300" (What?!) :mad:

(seriously, that movie is one of the best all time; it should not be touched)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Miaoww Newbie

Miaoww

Posted
Posted

I know it's about making money, but at some point the guys with the power to green light films have got to take a step back and think 'Y'know this film is a classic, let's not remake it.'

Stuff like Predator and True Grit shouldn't be touched. A sequel to Wall Street is pretty pathetic too. Indiana Jones 4 was poo, why make a fifth one? Which links me to Shia LeWhatever - what the fug is Hollywood's fascination with him? He's mediocre beyond belief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Houston Texans... You Suck!!!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • tukafan21
      Houston Texans... You Suck!!!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • CanadianCat
      Brooks RB, Placed on PUP, Out for 2025

      By CanadianCat · Posted

      If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...